首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Can primary care groups learn how to manage demand from fundholders? A study of fundholders in Nottingham.
【24h】

Can primary care groups learn how to manage demand from fundholders? A study of fundholders in Nottingham.

机译:初级保健团体可以学习如何管理基金持有人的需求吗?诺丁汉的基金持有人研究。

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Primary care groups (PCGs) will commission care for their patients and may be increasingly required to manage clearly defined resources. Existing general practice fundholders already operate in this environment, but can PCGs learn from the experience of fundholders in managing demand? AIM: To explore how general practice fundholders manage demand for hospital and community health services, and for prescribing. METHOD: A general practitioner (GP), and a fundholding manager from each of 26 practices were invited to take part. Questionnaires were developed, with structured and semi-structured components, and piloted in three practices. Interviews were conducted between October 1996 and February 1997 by the same interviewer (MDT). RESULTS: All practices stated that they were monitoring their waiting lists and giving priority to patients whose problems had become worse, but eight of the 23 GPs felt that they were unable to manage demand. Eight of the 15 fundholders who had developed in-house services actively managed the waiting list for these clinics. All fundholders had identified areas of unmet demand. Widely differing methods for increasing supply to meet demand were identified, and are described. Formularies were used by 12 out of the 23 fundholders. Guidelines were only considered useful by eight of the 23 practices; fundholders from later waves were less likely to find guidelines useful than fundholders from earlier waves (odds ratio [OR] = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0 to 0.96). Private specialist surgery was less likely to be accessed by later wave fundholders using the fund than by early wave fundholders (OR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: Fundholders in Nottingham had not developed consistent approaches to managing demand within limited resources. Given the apparent diversity of attitudes and practices, the larger PCGs will require strong support to develop the intended commissioning function.
机译:背景:初级保健团体(PCG)将委托其患者护理,并且可能越来越需要管理明确定义的资源。现有的普通业务投资人已经在这种环境中运作,但是PCG可以从投资人在管理需求方面的经验中学习吗?目的:探讨全科医生的资金持有人如何管理对医院和社区卫生服务的需求以及处方。方法:邀请一位全科医生(GP)和来自26种实践中每一种的资金持有经理参加。制定了具有结构化和半结构化成分的问卷,并在三种实践中进行了试点。在1996年10月至1997年2月之间,同一位访问员(MDT)进行了访谈。结果:所有实践都表示,他们正在监视他们的候诊名单,并优先考虑问题变得更加严重的患者,但是23位全科医生中有8位认为他们无法满足需求。开发内部服务的15个基金持有人中有8个积极管理了这些诊所的候补名单。所有基金持有人都确定了需求缺口。确定并描述了增加供应以满足需求的多种方法。 23个基金持有人中有12个使用配方。只有23种做法中的8种认为准则有用。后几波的基金持有人比前几波的基金持有人发现有用的指导的可能性较小(赔率[OR] = 0.11; 95%的置信区间[CI] = 0至0.96)。较之初波基金持有人,较晚波基金持有人使用该基金进行私人专科手术的可能性较小(OR = 0.10; 95%CI = 0.09至0.97)。结论:诺丁汉的资金持有者尚未开发出一致的方法来管理有限资源内的需求。考虑到态度和做法的明显差异,较大的PCG将需要强大的支持来开发预期的调试功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号