首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.
【24h】

Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.

机译:初级保健小组的服务委托:姑息治疗服务的全科医生和地区护士的优先顺序有所不同。

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have become more responsible for budget allocation over the years. The 1997 White Paper has signalled major changes in GPs' roles in commissioning. In general, palliative care is ranked as a high priority, and such services are therefore likely to be early candidates for commissioning. AIM: To examine the different commissioning priorities within the primary health care team (PHCT) by ascertaining the views of GPs and district nurses (DNs) concerning their priorities for the future planning of local palliative care services and the adequacy of services as currently provided. METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 167 GP principals and 96 registered DNs in the Cambridge area to ascertain ratings of service development priority and service adequacy, for which written comments were received. RESULTS: Replies were received from 141 (84.4%) GPs and 86 (90%) DNs. Both professional groups agreed that the most important service developments were urgent hospice admission for symptom control or terminal care, and Marie Curie nurses. GPs gave greater priority than DNs to specialist doctor home visits and Macmillan nurses. DNs gave greater priority than GPs to Marie Curie nurses, hospital-at-home, non-cancer patients' urgent hospice admission, day care, and hospice outpatients. For each of the eight services where significant differences were found in perceptions of service adequacy, DNs rated the service to be less adequate than GPs. CONCLUSION: The 1997 White Paper, The New NHS, has indicated that the various forms of GP purchasing are to be replaced by primary care groups (PCGs), in which both GPs and DNs are to be involved in commissioning decisions. For many palliative care services, DNs' views of service adequacy and priorities for future development differ significantly from their GP colleagues; resolution of these differences will need to be attained within PCGs. Both professional groups give high priority to the further development of quick-response clinical services, especially urgent hospice admission and Marie Curie nurses.
机译:背景:多年来,全科医生(GPs)对预算分配越来越负责。 1997年的白皮书标志着GP在调试中的作用发生了重大变化。通常,姑息治疗被列为高度优先事项,因此此类服务很可能是提早投入服务的候选者。目的:通过确定全科医生和地区护士(DN)关于他们未来规划本地姑息治疗服务的优先事项以及目前提供的服务是否充足的意见,来研究初级保健团队(PHCT)中不同的调试优先事项。方法:向剑桥地区的167名GP负责人和96个注册DN发送了邮政问卷调查,以确定服务开发优先级和服务充足性的等级,并收到书面评论。结果:收到来自141名(84.4%)全科医生和86名(90%)全科医生的答复。两个专业团体都同意,最重要的服务发展是为控制症状或进行终末护理而紧急接受临终关怀,以及玛丽居里护士。与专科医师相比,家庭医生比专科医师对家访和麦克米伦护士的重视程度更高。 DN比Marie Curie护士,居家医院,非癌症患者的紧急临终关怀,日托和临终关怀患者优先于GP。对于八项服务中,每项服务在服务充足性感知上存在显着差异,DN认为该服务不如GP足够。结论:1997年的白皮书《新的NHS》表明,各种形式的全科医生购买将被初级保健小组(PCG)取代,在该小组中,全科医生和DN都将参与调试决策。对于许多姑息治疗服务,DN与全科医生的同事对服务充分性和未来发展优先级的看法大不相同。在PCG中需要解决这些差异。这两个专业团体都高度重视快速响应临床服务的进一步发展,尤其是紧急临终关怀医院和玛丽居里护士。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号