...
首页> 外文期刊>The California Journal of Emergency Medicine >Using Geospatial Mapping to Determine the Impact of All-Terrain Vehicle Crashes on Both Rural and Urban Communities
【24h】

Using Geospatial Mapping to Determine the Impact of All-Terrain Vehicle Crashes on Both Rural and Urban Communities

机译:使用地理空间图确定全地形车祸对农村和城市社区的影响

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Deaths and injuries from all-terrain vehicle (ATV) crashes result in approximately700 deaths each year and more than 100,000 emergency department (ED) visits. Commonmisconceptions about ATV crashes are a significant barrier to injury prevention efforts, as is the lackof key information about where and how crashes occur. The purpose of this study was to determineATV crash patterns within a state, and to compare and contrast characteristics of these crashes as afunction of crash-site rurality. Methods: We performed descriptive, comparative, and regression analyses using a statewide off-roadvehicle crash and injury database (2002-2013). Comparisons were performed by rurality as defined usingthe Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) coding system, and we used geographic information system(GIS) software to map crash patterns at the zip code and county levels. Results: ATV crashes occurred throughout the state; 46% occurred in urban and 54% in rural zip codeareas. Comparisons of rider and crash characteristics by rurality showed similarities by sex, age, seatingposition, on vs. off the road, and crash mechanism. Conversely, helmet use was significantly loweramong victims of isolated rural crashes as compared to other victims (p=0.004). Crashes in isolatedrural and small rural areas accounted for only 39% of all crashes but resulted in 62% of fatalities. In bothrural and urban areas, less than one-quarter of roadway injuries were traffic related. Relative crash ratesvaried by county, and unique patterns were observed for crashes involving youth and roadway riders.During the study period, 10% and 50% of all crashes occurred in 2% and 20% of the state’s counties,respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests that ATV crashes are a public health concern for both rural and urbancommunities. However, isolated rural ATV crash victims were less likely to be helmeted, and rural victimswere over-represented among fatalities. Traffic was not the major factor in roadway crashes in eitherrural or urban areas. Unique crash patterns for different riding populations suggest that injury preventionexperts and public policy makers should consider the potential impact of geographical location whendeveloping injury prevention interventions. [West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(5)913-922.]
机译:简介:全地形车(ATV)事故造成的伤亡每年导致大约700人死亡,急诊室(ED)的访问量超过100,000。关于ATV撞车的常见误解是伤害预防工作的重要障碍,缺少关于撞车发生地点和方式的关键信息也是如此。这项研究的目的是确定一个州内的ATV撞车模式,并比较和对比这些撞车的特征,作为撞车地点农村地区的函数。方法:我们使用全州非公路车辆碰撞和伤害数据库(2002-2013)进行了描述性,比较性和回归分析。通过使用农村城市通勤区(RUCA)编码系统定义的农村地区进行比较,我们使用地理信息系统(GIS)软件在邮政编码和县级地图上映射崩溃模式。结果:全州发生亚视崩溃;城市中有46%,农村地区有54%。通过农村地区对骑手和撞车特征的比较显示出性别,年龄,座位位置,上,下路以及撞车机制的相似性。相反,在偏远的农村交通事故受难者中,相比其他受害人,头盔的使用显着降低(p = 0.004)。在偏远的农村地区和农村小地区,撞车事故仅占所有撞车事故的39%,但造成了62%的死亡人数。在农村和城市地区,不到四分之一的道路伤害与交通有关。相对事故率因县而异,并且观察到涉及青年和道路骑行者的事故的独特模式。在研究期间,所有事故的10%和50%分别发生在该州的2%和20%的县中。结论:这项研究表明,亚视事故是农村和城市社区的公共卫生问题。但是,偏僻的农村ATV坠毁受害者不太可能戴头盔,而农村受害者在死亡人数中所占比例过高。交通不是造成农村或城市道路交通事故的主要因素。针对不同骑行人群的独特碰撞模式表明,伤害预防专家和公共政策制定者在制定伤害预防措施时应考虑地理位置的潜在影响。 [西急救医学杂志。 2017; 18(5)913-922。]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号