...
首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >Long-term effects of different cleaning methods on copolyester retainer properties
【24h】

Long-term effects of different cleaning methods on copolyester retainer properties

机译:不同清洗方法对共聚酯保持器性能的长期影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate light transmittance, surface roughness, and flexural modulus of copolyester retainer material after long-term exposure to different cleaning methods. Materials and Methods: Standardized copolyester retainer specimens (ACE) were subjected to seven chemical cleaning solutions for 6 months: Invisalign cleaning crystals, Retainer Brite, Polident, Listerine mouthwash, 2.5% acetic acid, 0.6% NaClO, and 3% Hsub2/subOsub2/sub. Seventy specimens (n = 10 per method, 50.8 mm × 12.7 mm × 1.0 mm) were exposed to the different solutions twice a week for 2 minutes or according to manufacturer's instructions and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C. Another group of specimens (n = 10) was brushed with a standardized toothbrushing machine for 2 minutes twice a week. At baseline and 6 months, light transmittance, surface roughness and flexural modulus of the specimens were quantified using spectrophotometry, profilometry, and three-point bend testing, respectively. Qualitative assessment was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analyses were accomplished at a significance level of .05. Results: The results indicated that light transmittance through the specimens decreased significantly from baseline for all cleaning methods at 6 months. Flexural modulus of the specimens decreased significantly for all cleaning methods except Invisalign crystals and Retainer Brite (P .05). The Listerine group demonstrated the worst light transmittance change while Hsub2/subOsub2/sub demonstrated the greatest change in flexural modulus of the specimens compared with other cleaning methods; however, no qualitative difference was observed using SEM analysis. Conclusions: The results suggest that different cleaning methods affect long-term physical properties of the ACE retainer material. At the present time, none of these cleaning methods is ideal for copolyester retainer material.
机译:目的:评估长期暴露于不同清洁方法下的共聚酯保持器材料的透光率,表面粗糙度和弯曲模量。材料和方法:对标准共聚酯保持器样品(ACE)进行七种化学清洗溶液处理,历时6个月:Invisalign清洗晶体,保持剂沸腾剂,污垢,李斯汀漱口水,2.5%乙酸,0.6%NaClO和3%H 2 O 2 。每周两次或根据制造商的说明将70个样本(每种方法n = 10,50.8毫米×12.7毫米×1.0毫米)暴露于不同的溶液中2分钟,并保存在37°C的人工唾液中。另一组样本(n = 10)每周两次用标准牙刷机刷2分钟。在基线和6个月时,分别使用分光光度法,轮廓测定法和三点弯曲测试对样品的透光率,表面粗糙度和弯曲模量进行定量。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行定性评估。统计分析的显着性水平为0.05。结果:结果表明,对于所有清洁方法,在6个月时,穿过样品的透光率均明显低于基线。除Invisalign晶体和固位剂腐蚀(P> .05)外,所有清洁方法的样品弯曲模量均显着降低。与其他清洁方法相比,李斯特菌素组的透光率变化最差,而H 2 O 2 的弯曲模量变化最大。然而,使用SEM分析没有观察到质的差异。结论:结果表明,不同的清洁方法会影响ACE保持器材料的长期物理性能。目前,这些清洁方法都不是共聚酯保持器材料的理想选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号