首页> 外文期刊>Technology in cancer research & treatment. >Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
【24h】

Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies

机译:不适合行切除或消融治疗的小肝细胞癌患者的立体定向放射疗法联合或不联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 nodules, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B, and no vascular or extrahepatic metastases) were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. In principle, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was combined before stereotactic body radiation therapy (combination group), but some patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone. The prescribed dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy was 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter and 40 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions at the dose covering 95% of the planning target volume. The overall survival, progression-free survival, local progression free survival, and complication rates were retrospectively compared between the groups. Local progression was defined as irradiated tumor growth in dynamic computed tomography follow-up. Tumor responses were assessed according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Twenty-eight and 122 patients were enrolled in the stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups, respectively. The median follow-up periods were 16 and 29 months, respectively. The 2-year overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival times in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups were 78.6% and 80.3% (P = .6583), 49.0% and 42.9% (P = .188), and 71.4% and 80.8% (P = .9661), respectively. The incidence of ≥grade 3 toxicities was 17.9% in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone group and 18.9% in combination group (P = .903). Stereotactic body radiation therapy alone may be a good treatment option for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies.
机译:比较不适合行切除或消融治疗的小肝细胞癌患者接受或不采用经导管动脉化疗栓塞的立体定向放射治疗的疗效和安全性。总共有150例患有185例肝细胞癌(≤3个结节,Child-Turcotte-Pugh A级或B级,且无血管或肝外转移)的患者接受了立体定向放射疗法治疗。原则上,在进行立体定向放疗之前先行经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗(联合组),但有些患者仅接受立体定向放疗。立体定向放射疗法的处方剂量在等中心点为4个部分的48 Gy,在覆盖计划目标体积的95%的剂量下为4或5个部分的40 Gy。回顾性比较两组之间的总生存期,无进展生存期,局部无进展生存期和并发症发生率。局部进展被定义为在动态计算机断层扫描随访中受辐照的肿瘤生长。根据修改后的实体瘤反应评估标准评估肿瘤反应。根据“不良事件通用术语标准” 4.0版评估与治疗相关的毒性。分别有28例和122例患者接受了单独的立体定向放疗和联合组。中位随访期分别为16个月和29个月。单纯立体定向放疗和联合治疗组的2年总体,无进展和局部无进展生存时间分别为78.6%和80.3%(P = .6583),49.0%和42.9%(P = .188) ,分别为71.4%和80.8%(P = .9661)。单纯立体定向放射治疗组≥3级毒性的发生率为17.9%,联合组为18.9%(P = .903)。对于不能进行切除或消融治疗的小肝细胞癌患者,仅立体定向放射治疗可能是一个好的治疗选择。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号