Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up

摘要

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy, recurrence, complications and quality of life changes 3 years after Elevate-A/single incision mesh surgery anterior apical (SIM A) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and methods A prospective cohort study, 139 women, underwent transvaginal surgery for anterior and/or apical POP?>?stage 2, 69 patients had SIM A and 70 patients had SSF. The objective cure was defined as POP?≤?stage 1 anterior, apical according to POP-Q. Subjective cure is patient's negative feedback to question 2 and 3 of pelvic organ prolapse distress inventory 6 (POPDI-6). Patient's satisfaction was reported using validated quality of life questionnaires. Multi-channel urodynamic study was used to report any voiding problems related to the prolapse surgery 6 months after surgery. Results 119 patients completed a minimum of 3 years follow-up. 89.8% is the overall prolapse correction success rate for SIM A and 73.3% for SSF group (p?=?0.020), and 96.6% versus 73.4% at the anterior vaginal compartment respectively (p?≤?0.001). Statistically significant difference was noticed in apical compartment with 98.3% with SIM A and 85.0% with SSF (p?=?0.009). The subjective success rate, 86.4% in the SIM A and 70.0% in the SSF arm (p?=?0.030) was significantly noted. Only, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6) showed significant improvement. Operation time and intra-operative blood loss tend to be more with SIM A. Conclusion SIM A has better 3 years objective and subjective cure rate than SSF in the anterior and/or apical compartment prolapse.