首页> 外文期刊>Universal Journal of Public Health >The Formation of Organ Donation Policy in Germany: Evidence, Politics and Public Opinion
【24h】

The Formation of Organ Donation Policy in Germany: Evidence, Politics and Public Opinion

机译:德国器官捐赠政策的形成:证据,政治和舆论

获取原文
           

摘要

The gap between the demand and supply of organs for transplantation is a worldwide phenomenon that continues to tax policy-makers. We consider recent policy reforms in Germany, drawing on evidence from Spain and Austria for comparison. Our analysis adopts Kingdon’s multiple streams model which suggests that windows of opportunity for policy change open when an issue of public concern combines with a plausible solution and favorable political circumstances. Evidence is central to this process, but the type of evidence and the ways it is used, differ from technocratic formulations of evidence based policy-making. Scientific evidence may contribute to the rational appraisal of options, but this and other forms of evidence are also used rhetorically to generate political will and public support for change. We conclude by considering what the formation of organ donation policy in Germany reveals about the processes of policy-making under the competing imperatives of rationalism and democracy.
机译:器官移植的供求之间的鸿沟是一种全球现象,继续对决策者征税。我们将借鉴西班牙和奥地利的证据进行比较,考虑德国最近的政策改革。我们的分析采用了金顿(Kingdon)的多流模型,该模型表明,当公众关注的问题与合理的解决方案和有利的政治环境相结合时,政策变化的机会之窗便打开了。证据是此过程的核心,但是证据的类型和使用的方式与基于证据的政策制定的技术官僚主义形式不同。科学证据可能有助于对备选方案进行合理评估,但是这种和其他形式的证据也被用在口头上,以产生改变的政治意愿和公众支持。最后,我们考虑一下德国的器官捐赠政策的形成揭示了在理性主义和民主的对立竞争条件下的决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号