首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and Behavioral Sciences >The consequences of neglect in children: neurocognitive comparisons among conduct disordered and non-conduct disordered youth residing in foster-care with that of children from intact families
【24h】

The consequences of neglect in children: neurocognitive comparisons among conduct disordered and non-conduct disordered youth residing in foster-care with that of children from intact families

机译:忽视儿童的后果:寄养家庭中行为失常和非行为失常的青少年与完整家庭儿童的神经认知比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Children (n = 85) between the ages of 6 and 16 were administered two tests of source monitoring proficiency, one an external source test and the second an internal source test. In addition, the children were assessed using the Children's Category Test (CCT), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The primary interest was to compare the source monitoring and cognitive processes of children in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder and children in foster care without a psychiatric diagnosis. In addition, a group consisting of children living with their parents was included for comparative purposes. For the primary analyses, the dependent variables consisted of raw ISM and ESM scores, full-scale IQ, measures of working memory and processing speed, and the total and perseverative error measures of the WCST. First, because age differences were expected, a MANOVA was used with the age of the subject grouped into three categories of 6 to 8-, 9 to 12-, and 13 to 16-year olds. Following the verification of age differences on the dependent measures, a MANCOVA was used to examine the influence of abuseeglect by comparing individuals in foster care, with and without a psychiatric diagnosis. Therefore, the study comprised three groups: (1) a group of children living at home with the parents and serving as a comparison group, (2) a control group consisting of children living in foster care but with no psychiatric diagnosis, and (3) a group of children living in foster care with a diagnosed conduct disorder. Age, as a continuous variable, served as the covariate. ISM scores revealed that both of the control groups differed from the foster care/conduct disorder group, with scores in the foster care control group comparable to that of the intact family comparison group. The intact family comparison group had significantly higher FS-IQ scores than either foster care group. In addition, FS-IQ scores in the foster care control group were intermediate between that of the intact family comparison and conduct disorder groups. Children in the intact family comparison group made significantly fewer total errors and perseverative errors than either foster care group. However, the number of perseverative errors for the two foster care groups was comparable.
机译:对6至16岁的儿童(n = 85)进行了两次源监控能力测试,一次是外部源测试,第二次是内部源测试。此外,还使用儿童类别测验(CCT),韦氏儿童智力量表(第三版)和威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)对儿童进行了评估。主要的兴趣是比较寄养儿童中被诊断为行为障碍的儿童和未接受精神病诊断的寄养儿童的来源监测和认知过程。此外,出于比较目的,包括了一个由与父母同住的孩子组成的小组。对于主要分析,因变量包括原始ISM和ESM分数,全面IQ,工作记忆和处理速度的度量以及WCST的总误差和持久误差。首先,由于预期会出现年龄差异,因此使用MANOVA将该受试者的年龄分为6至8岁,9至12岁和13至16岁三类。在通过相关措施验证了年龄差异之后,通过比较有或没有精神病诊断的寄养者,使用MANCOVA来检查虐待/忽视的影响。因此,该研究包括三组:(1)与父母一起生活在家里并作为比较组的一组儿童;(2)由住在寄养机构但没有精神病诊断的孩子组成的对照组;以及(3 )居住在寄养中且被诊断为行为障碍的儿童。年龄作为连续变量,用作协变量。 ISM评分显示,两个对照组均与寄养/行为失调组有所不同,寄养组的得分与完整家庭比较组的得分相当。完整的家庭比较组的FS-IQ评分明显高于寄养组。此外,寄养护理对照组的FS-IQ得分介于完整家庭比较组和行为障碍组之间。完整家庭比较组中的儿童所犯的总错误和顽固性错误明显少于两个寄养儿童组。但是,两个寄养机构的永久性错误数量是可比较的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号