...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports >Prescribing Target Running Intensities for High-School Athletes: Can Forward and Backward Running Performance Be Autoregulated?
【24h】

Prescribing Target Running Intensities for High-School Athletes: Can Forward and Backward Running Performance Be Autoregulated?

机译:规定高中运动员的目标跑步强度:可以自动调节正向和反向跑步的表现吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Target running intensities are prescribed to enhance sprint-running performance and progress injured athletes back into competition, yet is unknown whether running speed can be achieved using autoregulation. This study investigated the consistency of running intensities in adolescent athletes using autoregulation to self-select velocity. Thirty-four boys performed 20 m forward running (FR) and backward running (BR) trials at slow, moderate and fast intensities (40–55%, 60–75% and +90% maximum effort, respectively) on three occasions. Absolute and relative consistency was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Systematic changes in 10 and 20 m performance were identified between trials 1–2 for moderate and fast BR ( p ≤ 0.01) and during moderate BR over 20 m across trials 2–3 ( p ≤ 0.05). However, comparisons between trials 2–3 resulted in low typical percentage error (CV ≤ 4.3%) and very good to excellent relative consistency (ICC ≥ 0.87) for all running speeds and directions. Despite FR being significantly ( p ≤ 0.01) faster than BR at slow (26%), moderate (28%) and fast intensities (26%), consistency was similar in both running directions and strongest at the fastest speeds. Following appropriate familiarization, youth athletes may use autoregulation to self-select prescribed FR and BR target running intensities.
机译:规定了目标跑步强度以增强短跑跑步性能并使受伤的运动员重返比赛状态,但尚不清楚是否可以使用自动调节来达到跑步速度。这项研究调查了自动调节自我选择速度的青少年运动员跑步强度的一致性。三十四名男孩分别在慢,中和快强度(分别为最大努力的40-55%,60-75%和+ 90%)上进行了20 m的向前跑步(FR)和向后跑步(BR)试验。使用变异系数(CV)和组内相关系数(ICC)评估绝对和相对一致性。在试验1–2中,对于中度和快速BR(10%和20 m),系统性变化被确定(p≤0.01),而在试验2–3中,在20 m的中度BR中,系统性变化发生了变化(p≤0.05)。但是,试验2–3之间的比较导致在所有行驶速度和方向下的典型百分比误差低(CV≤4.3%),并且相对良好的一致性非常好(ICC≥0.87)。尽管在慢速运动(26%),中速运动(28%)和快速运动强度(26%)时FR显着快于BR(p≤0.01),但在两个行驶方向上均表现出相似性,并且在最快速度下表现最强。经过适当的熟悉,青年运动员可以使用自动调节功能来自行选择规定的FR和BR目标跑步强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号