首页> 外文期刊>Nova Economia >Macroeconomic theory in the aftermath of the crisis: mainstream and new Keynesianism
【24h】

Macroeconomic theory in the aftermath of the crisis: mainstream and new Keynesianism

机译:危机后的宏观经济理论:主流和新凯恩斯主义

获取原文
           

摘要

The failure of mainstream macroeconomics to provide a suitable set of instruments to understand and fight against the economic crisis has triggered a debate among the dominant theoretical tendency, on its own foundations and on the macroeconomic policy that should be implemented after the crisis. The aim of this paper is to investigate to what extent the crisis affected mainstream macroeconomic theory and policy guidelines. We argue that new Keynesians did not pass unharmed by the crisis, themselvesacknowledging the need to adapt their models through the incorporation of new variables and ideas. The main change is the recognition of the non-neutrality of the financial system, which calls into question monetary policy guided by one instrument, the short-term interest rate, and by one target, the inflation rate, which would be insufficient to simultaneously lead to a stable and near potential output growth whilemaintainingthe stability of the financial system.
机译:主流宏观经济学未能提供一套合适的手段来理解和应对经济危机,引发了占主导地位的理论趋势,基于其自身的基础以及应在危机后实施的宏观经济政策之间的辩论。本文的目的是调查危机在多大程度上影响了主流宏观经济理论和政策指导。我们认为,新的凯恩斯主义者并没有受到危机的影响,他们自己承认有必要通过纳入新的变量和思想来调整其模型。主要的变化是对金融体系非中立性的认识,这使以一种工具(短期利率)和以一个目标(通货膨胀率)为指导的货币政策成为问题,而这不足以同时导致保持稳定和接近潜在的产出增长,同时保持金融体系的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号