...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Educacao Fisica e Esporte >Concordancia e correla??o entre três métodos distintos para quantifica??o da altura do salto vertical
【24h】

Concordancia e correla??o entre três métodos distintos para quantifica??o da altura do salto vertical

机译:三种不同的垂直跳动高度量化方法之间的一致性和相关性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association and the agreement among three different methods to quantify of the vertical jump height: abalakov belt (AB), contact mat (TC) and videogrammetry (VG). Thirteen female volleyball players performed three maximal countermovement jumps, without the help of upper limbs. The three methods were used simultaneously to quantify the jump height. The lowest correlation (r = 0.77; p < 0.01) was found between VG and AB, while the strongest correlation (r = 0.92; p < 0.01) was found between VG and TC methods. In addition, Bland and Altman plots revealed no satisfactory agreement between the methods. These findings suggest precaution to compare the results of vertical jump height from different methods.
机译:本研究的目的是分析量化垂直跳高的三种不同方法之间的关联和一致性:abalakov带(AB),接触垫(TC)和视频测量(VG)。 13名女排运动员在没有上肢帮助的情况下进行了三个最大的反跳动作。同时使用这三种方法来量化跳跃高度。 VG和AB方法之间的相关性最低(r = 0.77; p <0.01),而VG和TC方法之间的相关性最强(r = 0.92; p <0.01)。此外,布兰德(Bland)和奥特曼(Altman)的图表明方法之间没有令人满意的一致性。这些发现建议采取预防措施,以比较不同方法的垂直跳高结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号