首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Colo-Proctologia : orgao oficial >Analysis of 33 surgical specimens of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer in the early learning curve: margins and nodes harvest do not differ from open resections
【24h】

Analysis of 33 surgical specimens of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer in the early learning curve: margins and nodes harvest do not differ from open resections

机译:在早期学习曲线中分析33例大肠癌腹腔镜手术切除手术标本:切缘和结节收获与开放性切除无差异

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

> face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">INTRODUCTION: Colorectal laparoscopic surgery is considered a procedure with long learning curve. Despite surgeons with experience in laparoscopic surgery are able to achieve the same oncological results obtained in open procedures, it is important to evaluate if these good results are sustained during the learning curve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of the margins and the lymph nodes harvest in early learning curve of laparoscopic colectomies performed by specialized surgeons compared to open colectomies. METHODS: Thirty-three surgical specimens of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer performed during the early learning curve were evaluated. The following data were analyzed: age, sex, tumor location, pathologic classification, lymph node harvest and proximal and distal margins. Data were compared to a control group of 45 open resections for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Age, tumor location and Dukes classification of laparoscopic and open groups were similar. Laparoscopic group had more female patients. Distal margins were similar between the groups [mean of 7,15 cm (SD ± 9,98) for open and 8,26 cm (SD ± 11,5) for laparoscopic group, p=NS]. There was no difference in the lymph nodes harvest between the groups. The mean of lymph nodes harvest of open and laparoscopic groups were 19 (SD ± 19,41) and 21 (SD ± 14,73), respectively, (p=NS). CONCLUSION: Oncologic margins and lymph nodes harvest obtained during early learning curve of laparoscopic resections were similar to open procedures. Despite the natural difficulties faced during early learning curve, oncologic criteria can be achieved when laparoscopic colorectal resections are performed by specialized surgeons working with gastrointestinal pathology team.
机译:> face =“ Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif” size =“ 2”> 引言:大肠腹腔镜手术被认为是一项学习曲线较长的手术。尽管具有腹腔镜手术经验的外科医生能够在开放手术中获得相同的肿瘤学结果,但重要的是评估在学习过程中这些良好结果是否持续。这项研究的目的是评估与开放式Colectomies相比,由专科医生进行的腹腔镜Colectomies早期学习曲线中切缘和淋巴结收获的充分性。 方法:评估了在早期学习曲线期间对腹腔镜切除的大肠癌切除术的33例手术标本。分析以下数据:年龄,性别,肿瘤位置,病理学分类,淋巴结收集以及近端和远端切缘。将数据与45例结直肠癌开放切除的对照组进行比较。 结果:腹腔镜和开放组的年龄,肿瘤位置和Dukes分类相似。腹腔镜组女性患者较多。两组之间的末梢切缘相似[开腹平均为7.15 cm(SD±9,98),腹腔镜手术平均为8.26 cm(SD±11,5),p = NS]。两组之间的淋巴结收获没有差异。开放组和腹腔镜组的平均淋巴结收获分别为19(SD±19,41)和21(SD±14,73)(p = NS)。 结论:腹腔镜切除术早期学习曲线获得的肿瘤切缘和淋巴结收获与开放手术相似。尽管在早期学习过程中会遇到自然困难,但由胃肠道病理学团队的专门外科医生进行腹腔镜大肠切除术可以达到肿瘤学标准。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号