首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine Reports >Extensive carotid atherosclerosis and the diagnostic accuracy of coronary risk calculators
【24h】

Extensive carotid atherosclerosis and the diagnostic accuracy of coronary risk calculators

机译:广泛的颈动脉粥样硬化和冠脉风险计算器的诊断准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Preventive therapy in primary care is guided by risk thresholds for future cardiovascular events. We aimed to assess whether the sensitivity of various risk calculators for the detection of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (TPA80) could be improved by lowering risk thresholds in younger age groups. We compared sensitivity, specificity, and discriminatory performance of SCORE, SCORE-HDL, PROCAM, AGLA, FRAM and PCE coronary risk calculators to detect total plaque area 80 mm2 (TPA80), a coronary risk equivalent, in age groups 40–55, 56–65, 66–75 from Germany (DE, N = 2942) and Switzerland (CH, N = 2202) during the years 2002 to 2016. All calculators showed good to moderate discriminatory performance to detect TPA80 with AUC ranging from 0.74 (CH-AGLA) to 0.87 (DE- SCORE), but the sensitivity of high risk risk thresholds varied widely from 39% for DE-FRAM-CVD to 5% for CH-AGLA. Lowering of the risk threshold increased sensitivity substantially at the expense of minor losses in specificity, but the sensitivity generally remained 45% at the 90% specificity threshold. Current risk thresholds of American and European coronary risk calculators have a low sensitivity to detect TPA80 in younger individuals. Highlights ? Low sensitivity of European and American risk calculators in two independent populations ? Relatively high prevalence of advanced carotid atherosclerosis in people aged 40–65 ? New thresholds for intermediate or high risk in younger subjects.
机译:初级保健中的预防性治疗以未来心血管事件的风险阈值为指导。我们旨在评估是否可以通过降低年轻年龄组的风险阈值来提高各种风险计算器对亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化(TPA80)检测的敏感性。我们比较了40至55岁年龄段的SCORE,SCORE-HDL,PROCAM,AGLA,FRAM和PCE冠心病风险计算器的敏感性,特异性和区分性,以检测总斑块面积> 80 mm2(TPA80)(相当于冠心病风险),在2002年至2016年期间,分别来自德国(DE,N = 2942)和瑞士(CH,N = 2202)的56-65、66-75。所有计算器都显示出良好的识别性能,可检测AUC为0.74(CHC)的TPA80 -AGLA)到0.87(DE-SCORE),但是高风险阈值的敏感性差异很大,从DE-FRAM-CVD的39%到CH-AGLA的5%。降低风险阈值实质上会增加敏感性,但会损失少量的特异性,但在90%特异性阈值下,敏感性通常保持<45%。美国和欧洲冠脉风险计算器的当前风险阈值对检测年轻人中TPA80的敏感性较低。强调 ?欧美风险计算器在两个独立人群中的敏感性较低? 40-65岁人群中晚期颈动脉粥样硬化的患病率相对较高?新的中,高风险受试者门槛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号