首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Manufacturing >Comparing Occlusion Method by Display Blanking to Occlusion Goggles
【24h】

Comparing Occlusion Method by Display Blanking to Occlusion Goggles

机译:通过显示消隐与遮挡护目镜比较遮挡方法

获取原文
           

摘要

The paper reports on an experiment, which compares the occlusion methods: display blanking (via an Android application) and classical occlusion glasses with liquid crystal shutters. According to ISO 16673:2007 both methods are applicable. Therefore, the results and findings are compared and discussed for three use cases: Occlusion software application (display blanking) as a teaching aid, self-test for software developers and laboratory tests. For most tasks, both methods yield comparable results. Using display blanking for teaching purposes and propagating the method could be valuable. For the use in a typical developer workbench/desktop self-test, the operator must be aware that various influences can result in an underestimation of occlusion metrics. Nevertheless, it would be a benefit if developers apply the method in an early phase. For laboratory tests, we would further recommend the use of occlusion glasses.
机译:该论文报告了一个实验,该实验比较了遮挡方法:显示消隐(通过Android应用程序)和带有液晶百叶窗的经典遮挡眼镜。根据ISO 16673:2007,两种方法均适用。因此,将对三种用例的结果和发现进行比较和讨论:遮挡软件应用程序(显示空白)作为教具,软件开发人员的自测和实验室测试。对于大多数任务,两种方法都能产生可比的结果。将显示消隐用于教学目的和传播该方法可能很有价值。为了在典型的开发人员工作台/桌面自测中使用,操作员必须意识到各种影响会导致对遮挡指标的低估。但是,如果开发人员在早期阶段应用该方法将是一个好处。对于实验室测试,我们将进一步建议使用咬合眼镜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号