首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics >Comparing occlusion method by display blanking to occlusion goggles
【24h】

Comparing occlusion method by display blanking to occlusion goggles

机译:通过显示消隐到闭塞护目镜的闭塞方法

获取原文

摘要

The paper reports on an experiment, which compares the occlusion methods: display blanking (via an Android application) and classical occlusion glasses with liquid crystal shutters. According to ISO 16673:2007 both methods areapplicable. Therefore, the results and findings are compared and discussed for three use cases: Occlusion software application (display blanking) as a teaching aid, self-test for software developers and laboratory tests. For most tasks, both methods yield comparable results. Using display blanking for teaching purposes and propagating the method could be valuable. For the use in a typical developer workbench/desktopself-test, the operator must be aware that variousinfluencescan result in an underestimation of occlusion metrics. Nevertheless, it would be a benefit if developers apply the method in an early phase. For laboratory tests, we would further recommend the use of occlusion glasses.
机译:本文报告了一个实验,它比较了遮挡方法:显示消隐(通过Android应用)和具有液晶百叶窗的经典闭塞眼镜。根据ISO 16673:2007这两种方法都是区域。因此,将结果和结果进行了比较和讨论了三种用例:封闭软件应用程序(显示消隐)作为教学辅助,软件开发人员和实验室测试的自检。对于大多数任务,两种方法都产生了可比的结果。使用显示消隐进行教学目的和传播该方法可能是有价值的。对于在典型的开发人员工作台/桌面测试中使用,操作员必须意识到各种inluencescan导致低估了遮挡度量。尽管如此,如果开发人员在早期阶段应用该方法,这将是一个好处。对于实验室测试,我们将进一步推荐使用闭塞眼镜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号