首页> 外文期刊>Primary care companion to the journal of clinical psychiatry >Detection and Classification of Suicidal Behavior and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Behavior in Emergency Departments
【24h】

Detection and Classification of Suicidal Behavior and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Behavior in Emergency Departments

机译:急诊科自杀行为和非自杀自伤行为的检测与分类

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The degree of concordance between clinical and standardized assessments in the detection and classification of suicidal behavior and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior in psychiatric emergency department settings was examined. Method: Two hundred fifty-four patients at 3 psychiatric emergency departments between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated by research staff using standardized assessments of suicidal behavior and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior. Of 254 patients, 128 (50%) made a recent suicide attempt, 30 (12%) engaged in recent nonsuicidal self-injury behavior, 20 (8%) made a recent suicide attempt interrupted by self or others, and 76 (30%) had other psychiatric symptoms in the absence of recent suicidal or nonsuicidal self-injury behavior. The classifications derived from the standardized assessments using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) nomenclature were compared to clinical assessments independently extracted from emergency department medical records. Results: Agreement between clinical and standardized assessments was substantial for both suicide attempts (κ = 0.76, P .001) and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior (κ = 0.72, P .001). Importantly, 18% of patients determined to have made a suicide attempt in the past week by standardized assessment were not identified as such by clinical assessment. In addition, as measured by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, the potential lethality of attempts for patients classified as making a recent suicide attempt by both clinician and standardized assessments was significantly greater (t120 = 2.1, P = .04) than that for patients who were classified as having made an attempt by the standardized but not clinical assessment. Conclusions: The use of standardized assessment measures may improve sensitivity and accuracy of identifying suicidal behavior and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior in psychiatric emergency departments.
机译:目的:检查精神病急诊室中自杀行为和非自杀性自残行为的检测和分类中临床评估与标准化评估之间的一致性程度。方法:研究人员使用标准化的自杀行为和非自杀性自残行为评估方法,对2007年至2011年间3个精神科急诊科的254例患者进行了评估。在254位患者中,有128位(50%)最近尝试自杀,有30位(12%)最近进行了非自杀式自残行为,有20位(8%)最近的自杀尝试是被自身或他人打断,76位(30% )在没有最近的自杀或非自杀性自残行为的情况下还有其他精神症状。将使用疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)命名法从标准化评估中得出的分类与从急诊科病历中独立提取的临床评估进行比较。结果:对于自杀未遂(κ= 0.76,P <.001)和非自杀性自残行为(κ= 0.72,P <.001),临床评估与标准化评估之间的一致性是重要的。重要的是,在过去一周中通过标准化评估确定自杀未遂的患者中,有18%的患者并未通过临床评估被确定为自杀未遂。此外,根据《哥伦比亚自杀严重性等级量表》的测量,临床医生和标准化评估将被归类为近期自杀未遂的患者的潜在未遂致死率明显高于患者(t120 = 2.1,P = .04)。被标准化但未经过临床评估归类为尝试的人。结论:使用标准化评估方法可以提高在精神病急诊科中识别自杀行为和非自杀性自残行为的敏感性和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号