...
首页> 外文期刊>Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology >Logical and Nomological Obstacles to Foreknowledge of the Future
【24h】

Logical and Nomological Obstacles to Foreknowledge of the Future

机译:预知未来的逻辑和名词学障碍

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A famous puzzle called “Grandmother Paradox” is used to argue against the feasibility of traveling backward in time because of the logical and nomological problems such travel involves, and not only because we don’t have the technology to make it reality.? The same kind of problems would be encountered in leaping forward in time and then returning to the time of departure.? We argue that a similar family of problems also arise in our having foreknowledge of the future without making any time travel.? We point to the mysterious consequences of having access to a being, say a machine or a psychic, that can have infallible knowledge of the future and conveys this foreknowledge to human beings truthfully, without any lies or distortions.? The cause of these mysterious consequences is the fact that such machines or psychics will raise logical and nomological complications reminiscent of the ones we encounter in time travel scenarios, and that is a strong reason why infallible foretellers cannot exist.? We conclude that we can have foreknowledge of the future, in principle , only within certain narrow limits, if at all.
机译:人们用一个著名的难题称为“祖母悖论”来反对及时回程的可行性,因为这种回程涉及逻辑和法理问题,而不仅仅是因为我们没有使之成为现实的技术。在时间上跃升然后回到出发时间会遇到同样的问题。我们认为,如果我们对未来没有任何时间旅行的了解,也会出现类似的问题。我们指出了接触存在的神秘后果,比如说机器或心灵,它们可以对未来有绝对的了解,并且将这种预知真实地传达给人类,而没有任何谎言或歪曲。这些神秘后果的原因在于,这样的机器或心理会增加逻辑和法理上的复杂性,使人联想到我们在时空旅行中遇到的那种复杂性,这就是为什么不存在可靠的预言家的强大原因。我们得出的结论是,原则上只有在一定的狭窄范围内(如果有的话),我们才能预知未来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号