...
首页> 外文期刊>Population health metrics >A composite metric for assessing data on mortality and causes of death: the vital statistics performance index
【24h】

A composite metric for assessing data on mortality and causes of death: the vital statistics performance index

机译:评估死亡率和死亡原因数据的综合指标:生命统计绩效指数

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Timely and reliable data on causes of death are fundamental for informed decision-making in the health sector as well as public health research. An in-depth understanding of the quality of data from vital statistics (VS) is therefore indispensable for health policymakers and researchers. We propose a summary index to objectively measure the performance of VS systems in generating reliable mortality data and apply it to the comprehensive cause of death database assembled for the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2013 Study. Methods We created a Vital Statistics Performance Index, a composite of six dimensions of VS strength, each assessed by a separate empirical indicator. The six dimensions include: quality of cause of death reporting, quality of age and sex reporting, internal consistency, completeness of death reporting, level of cause-specific detail, and data availability/timeliness. A simulation procedure was developed to combine indicators into a single index. This index was computed for all country-years of VS in the GBD 2013 cause of death database, yielding annual estimates of overall VS system performance for 148 countries or territories. Results The six dimensions impacted the accuracy of data to varying extents. VS performance declines more steeply with declining simulated completeness than for any other indicator. The amount of detail in the cause list reported has a concave relationship with overall data accuracy, but is an important driver of observed VS performance. Indicators of cause of death data quality and age/sex reporting have more linear relationships with simulated VS performance, but poor cause of death reporting influences observed VS performance more strongly. VS performance is steadily improving at an average rate of 2.10% per year among the 148 countries that have available data, but only 19.0% of global deaths post-2000 occurred in countries with well-performing VS systems. Conclusions Objective and comparable information about the performance of VS systems and the utility of the data that they report will help to focus efforts to strengthen VS systems. Countries and the global health community alike need better intelligence about the accuracy of VS that are widely and often uncritically used in population health research and monitoring.
机译:背景技术关于死亡原因的及时可靠数据对于卫生部门的明智决策以及公共卫生研究至关重要。因此,对于卫生政策制定者和研究人员来说,对生命统计数据(VS)数据质量的深入了解是必不可少的。我们提出一个汇总指标,以客观地衡量VS系统在生成可靠的死亡率数据方面的性能,并将其应用于为2013年全球疾病负担(GBD)研究而组建的综合死亡原因数据库。方法我们创建了生命统计绩效指数,该指数由VS强度的六个维度组成,每个维度均由单独的经验指标进行评估。这六个维度包括:死亡原因报告的质量,年龄和性别报告的质量,内部一致性,死亡报告的完整性,特定原因的详细程度以及数据可用性/及时性。开发了模拟程序以将指标组合为一个索引。该指数是针对GBD 2013死因数据库中所有VS年的VS年计算的,得出148个国家或地区VS系统总体性能的年度估算。结果六个维度在不同程度上影响了数据的准确性。与其他指标相比,随着模拟完整性的下降,VS性能的下降幅度更大。报告的原因列表中的详细信息量与总体数据准确性之间存在凹入关系,但是观察到的VS性能的重要驱动因素。死亡原因数据质量和年龄/性别报告的指标与模拟的VS性能具有更多的线性关系,但是较差的死亡原因报告对观察到的VS性能的影响更大。在拥有可用数据的148个国家中,VS性能以每年平均2.10%的速度稳步提高,但2000年后全球死亡人数中只有19.0%发生在具有良好VS系统的国家。结论关于VS系统性能及其所报告数据的实用性的客观且可比较的信息将有助于集中精力加强VS系统。各国和全球卫生界都需要更好地了解VS的准确性,而VS的准确性在人群健康研究和监测中被广泛使用,并且常常被不加批判地使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号