...
首页> 外文期刊>Polski Przegland Chirurgiczny >Own Superficial Femoral Vein Versus Silver Bonded Artificial Graft in Patients with Vascular Prosthesis Infection in Aorto-Femoral Position: Treatment Results Comparison
【24h】

Own Superficial Femoral Vein Versus Silver Bonded Artificial Graft in Patients with Vascular Prosthesis Infection in Aorto-Femoral Position: Treatment Results Comparison

机译:股骨假体感染患者的股浅静脉与银键人工移植的比较:治疗结果比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Own Superficial Femoral Vein Versus Silver Bonded Artificial Graft in Patients with Vascular Prosthesis Infection in Aorto-Femoral Position: Treatment Results ComparisonVascular prosthesis infection in aorto-femoral position presents a life-threatening complication. Two operative modalities are utilized in the authors center: own superficial femoral veins (SFVR) and silver salts bonded anatomic reconstruction (AgR).The aim of the study was comparison of the two treatment methods in terms of early and distant clinical resultsMaterial and methods. 35 patients were qualified for infected aorto-femoral graft removal. In years 2000-2004 SFVR was conducted in 19 patients and in years 2005-2007 16 patients had AgR done. These groups were compared in terms of demographic, co-morbidity, vascular reconstructions history, infection symptoms and bacterial contamination. Then treatment results analysis was performed including: operation course, mortality, postoperative morbidity, amputation rate and further observation results.Results. There were no differences in demographic and co-morbidity between the groups. First operation/clinical symptoms onset interval was significantly longer for AgR patients (8 vs 3.3 years, p=0.001). Purulent inguinal sinus was dominating infection manifestation in both groups. Swab results were similar for both groups (Gram+ species dominated in both). Analysis of course and results of operative treatment revealed that AgR operation time was shorter than SFVR (195 vs 317, p<0.001), intraoperative blood requirement was also lower for AgPR (1.6 vs 3.1, p<0.05). Postoperative death, postoperative bleeding, reinterventions and amputation rate were higher for SFVR than AgR, however differences were not significant. During follow-up no infection recurrence was observed.Conclusions. We believe that AgPR is superior comparing with SFVR for patients with infected vascular prosthesis in the aorto-femoral prosthesis. Further investigations are mandatory to confirm our results.
机译:主动脉股动脉假体感染患者的自身股浅静脉与银键人工移植物的比较:治疗结果比较主动脉股骨位置人工血管假体感染表现出危及生命的并发症。作者中心采用了两种手术方式:自身股浅静脉(SFVR)和银盐结合解剖重建(AgR)。研究的目的是比较两种治疗方法在早期和远期临床结果方面的材料和方法。 35例患者符合被感染的主动脉-股骨移植的条件。在2000-2004年间,对19例患者进行了SFVR,在2005-2007年间,对16例患者进行了AgR。比较了这些人群的人口统计学,合并症,血管重建史,感染症状和细菌污染。然后进行治疗结果分析,包括:手术过程,死亡率,术后发病率,截肢率以及进一步的观察结果。两组之间的人口统计学和合并症没有差异。 AgR患者的首次手术/临床症状发作间隔明显更长(8年比3.3年,p = 0.001)。脓性腹股沟窦是两组的主要感染表现。两组的拭子结果相似(两组均以Gram +物种为主)。病程分析和手术治疗结果显示,AgR手术时间短于SFVR(195比317,p <0.001),AgPR的术中血液需求量也更低(1.6比3.1,p <0.05)。 SFVR的术后死亡,术后出血,再次干预和截肢率高于AgR,但差异无统计学意义。随访期间未观察到感染复发。我们认为,在主动脉股骨假体中感染了血管假体的患者,AgPR比SFVR更好。为了确认我们的结果,必须进行进一步的调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号