首页> 外文期刊>Polish Archives of Internal Medicine >District versus academic hospitals: differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation without valvular heart disease treated with oral anticoagulants
【24h】

District versus academic hospitals: differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation without valvular heart disease treated with oral anticoagulants

机译:地区医院与学术医院:口服抗凝药治疗无瓣膜性心脏病的房颤患者的临床特征差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the?first?line drugs in stroke prevention in patients with AF. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy may differ between medical c enters. Objectives We compared the clinical characteristics of AF patients treated with OAC in a district and an academic hospital. Patients and methods We analyzed 3528 patients from the multicenter retrospective CRAFT study: 2666 patients from the?academic hospital and 862 patients from the?district hospital. Their baseline clinical characteristics were compared. Results Patients treated in the district hospital were older (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [10.3] years vs 66.0 [13.4] years; P 0.001) and more likely female (49.1% vs 37.4%; P 0.001). Patients treated in the academic hospital more frequently had paroxysmal AF, while those in the district hospital, permanent AF. The latter group was also more likely to have comorbidities and a higher frequency of previous bleeding episodes or anemia. The?groups did not differ regarding kidney function. In both groups, patients were significantly more likely to be on rivaroxaban than on dabigatran. The group treated in the district hospital were at higher risk of thromboembolic events than the other gruop (mean [SD] CHA2DS2VASc score, 4.6 [1.7] vs 3.05 [2.0]; P 0.001), as well as of hemorrhagic events (mean [SD] HASBLED score, 0.6 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.6]; P 0.001). Conclusions Patients with AF treated with OACs in the district and academic hospitals have different clinical characteristics. Patients treated in the district hospital were older, had more comorbidities, more frequently had permanent AF, and were at higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events than patients treated in the?academic hospital.
机译:简介心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心律不齐,具有较高的发病率和死亡率风险。非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂是房颤患者预防卒中的第一线药物。医务人员之间的口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗可能有所不同。目的我们比较了某地区和一家学术医院接受OAC治疗的AF患者的临床特征。患者和方法我们分析了多中心回顾性CRAFT研究中的3528例患者:来自学术医院的2666例患者和来自地区医院的862例患者。比较了他们的基线临床特征。结果在地区医院接受治疗的患者年龄更大(平均[SD]年龄,分别为73.9 [10.3]岁和66.0 [13.4]岁; P <0.001),女性的可能性更大(49.1%vs 37.4%; P <0.001)。在学术医院接受治疗的患者更常发生阵发性AF,而在地区医院接受治疗的患者则为永久性AF。后者也更可能合并症,并且以前发生出血或贫血的频率更高。两组在肾功能方面没有差异。在两组中,患者使用利伐沙班的可能性均明显高于达比加群。在地区医院接受治疗的组发生血栓栓塞事件的风险高于另一组(均值[SD] CHA2DS2VASc评分,分别为4.6 [1.7]和3.05 [2.0]; P <0.001),以及出血事件(均值[ SD] HASBLED得分,分别为0.6 [0.7]和0.4 [0.6]; P <0.001)。结论区医院和学术医院采用OAC进行房颤治疗的患者具有不同的临床特征。与在学校医院接受治疗的患者相比,在地区医院接受治疗的患者年龄更大,合并症更多,永久性房颤的发生频率更高,发生血栓栓塞和出血事件的风险更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号