首页> 外文期刊>Paediatrics & Child Health >USE OF ANDROID APP VS BROCHURE EDUCATION FOR TEACHING NORTHERN ONTARIO CHILD CAREGIVERS ON CAR SEAT SAFETY
【24h】

USE OF ANDROID APP VS BROCHURE EDUCATION FOR TEACHING NORTHERN ONTARIO CHILD CAREGIVERS ON CAR SEAT SAFETY

机译:使用ANDROID APP VS指导教育来培训北方安大略省儿童座椅安全座椅驾驶员

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Canadian society has been increasingly reliant on mobile devices, internet, and apps for information. Parents commonly browse for health information online, or ask about the use of specific websites or mobile apps. Is there still a role for paper brochures? OBJECTIVES: This study had 3 main objectives. First, the study investigated whether child caregivers preferred using a mobile app or conventional paper brochure for education. Secondly, the study compared the educational impact of both these tools. The final aim was to educate Northern Ontario (Sudbury) child caregivers on car seat safety. A?paper brochure and an android app matched in content, color and font style were created in car seat safety. DESIGN/METHODS: Caregivers of children under age 9 were randomized into 2 groups: they received either a brochure or app. Afterwards, participants rated their satisfaction on the product assigned. The teaching potential of each product was evaluated by a short quiz given before and after using the tool. Finally, both groups were given the alternative education product after completing the study, to assess preference. RESULTS: 45 caregivers were enrolled in this study; 44 caregivers’ results were included in the analysis. The majority of caregivers in both randomized groups preferred using the app (50% or greater in both groups), or had no preference. The brochure was least popular in both groups. The satisfaction scores of both groups with their randomized education tool was equal (app satisfaction 8.7/10 vs. brochure satisfaction 7.7/10, no statistical difference). Despite the brochure being less popular, brochure randomized group did better on their post- quiz, suggesting that the brochure was more effective at teaching compared to the app (Brochure group improved by mean of 0.54 points compared to App group mean 0.11 points; p<0.05 statistically significant). CONCLUSION: This project suggested that child caregivers prefer electronic tools for their easy accessibility and novelty, or have ambivalent preference to both methods of education. Despite the caregivers’ preference for using the app, they appear to learn better from brochure in this study. This study suggested we should continue to offer both forms of education to parents. Articles from Paediatrics & Child Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press.
机译:背景:加拿大社会越来越依赖于移动设备,互联网和信息应用程序。父母通常会在网上浏览健康信息,或询问有关特定网站或移动应用程序的使用情况。纸质手册仍然有作用吗?目的:本研究有3个主要目标。首先,该研究调查了看护者是否更喜欢使用移动应用程序或传统的纸质小册子进行教育。其次,研究比较了这两种工具的教育影响。最终目的是对安大略省北部(萨德伯里)的儿童看护者进行汽车安全座椅的教育。在汽车安全座椅上创建了内容,颜色和字体样式相匹配的纸质手册和一个android应用程序。设计/方法:将9岁以下儿童的照护者随机分为两组:他们收到了宣传册或应用程序。之后,参与者对分配的产品进行了满意的评价。在使用该工具之前和之后,通过简短测验评估每种产品的教学潜力。最后,在完成研究后,为两组学生提供替代教育产品,以评估他们的偏好。结果:本研究招募了45名护理人员。分析中包括44位护理人员的结果。两个随机分组中的大多数护理人员都倾向于使用该应用程序(两组均占50%或更高),或者没有偏好。这本小册子在两组中最受欢迎。两组使用随机教育工具的满意度得分均相等(应用程序满意度为8.7 / 10,小册子满意度为7.7 / 10,无统计学差异)。尽管该小册子不那么受欢迎,但随机小册子组的测验成绩更好,这表明该小册子在教学方面比应用程序更有效(小册子组平均提高了0.54分,而应用程序组平均提高了0.11分; p < 0.05有统计学意义)。结论:该项目表明,儿童看护者更喜欢电子工具,因为它们易于获取和新颖,或者对两种教育方法都抱有矛盾的偏爱。尽管看护者偏爱使用该应用程序,但他们似乎从本研究的小册子中学习得更好。这项研究表明,我们应该继续向父母提供两种形式的教育。牛津大学出版社在此提供儿科学与儿童健康方面的文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号