首页> 外文期刊>Pragmatic and Observational Research >Real-life effectiveness and safety of the inhalation suspension budesonide comparator vs the originator product for the treatment of patients with asthma: a historical cohort study using a US health claims database
【24h】

Real-life effectiveness and safety of the inhalation suspension budesonide comparator vs the originator product for the treatment of patients with asthma: a historical cohort study using a US health claims database

机译:吸入悬浮布地奈德比较剂与鼻祖产品治疗哮喘患者的真实有效性和安全性:一项使用美国健康声明数据库的历史队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether the effectiveness of budesonide comparator is non-inferior to budesonide reference in the prevention of asthma exacerbations. Asthma-related hospitalizations and safety were also examined. Methods: This study used a matched, historic cohort design. Data were drawn from the Clinformatics? Data Mart US claims database and included a 1-year baseline, starting 1?year before the index prescription date, and a 1-year outcome period. Patients received budesonide comparator or reference treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of asthma exacerbations. Non-inferiority for budesonide comparator vs budesonide reference was established if the 95% confidence interval (CI) upper limit of mean difference in proportions between treatments was <15%. Secondary outcomes examined rate of asthma-related hospitalizations and adverse events (AEs). Results: The budesonide comparator and reference-matched cohorts each included 3109 patients. The adjusted upper 95% CI for the difference in proportions of patients experiencing asthma exacerbations was 0.035 (3.5%), demonstrating non-inferiority. Cohorts did not significantly differ in the rate of asthma exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio [RR]=1.04, 95% CI: 0.95–1.14) or rate of asthma-related hospitalizations (adjusted RR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.99–1.24) after adjusting for baseline confounders. No asthma exacerbations occurred during the outcome period in 72.9% of budesonide comparator patients and 71.8% of budesonide reference patients. No asthma-related hospitalizations occurred in 77.9% of patients in the budesonide comparator cohort and 79.0% of patients in the budesonide reference cohort. The most frequent AEs were throat irritation (≤0.4% of patients) and hoarseness/dysphonia (0.02% of patients). AEs did not significantly differ between treatment cohorts. Conclusion: In this real-life study, non-inferiority of the budesonide comparator vs reference was met for the primary end point of asthma exacerbation rates. Asthma-related hospitalization and AE rates did not differ between the two treatment cohorts. The budesonide comparator is an effective and safe treatment alternative for asthma exacerbations.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定布地奈德比较剂在预防哮喘急性发作方面的疗效是否不低于布地奈德参考标准。还检查了哮喘相关的住院和安全性。方法:本研究采用匹配的,历史悠久的队列设计。数据来自临床信息学? Data Mart US索赔数据库包括1年基线,从索引处方日期前1年开始,以及1年结果期。患者接受布地奈德比较剂或参考治疗。主要结局是哮喘急性发作率。如果治疗之间比例的平均差异的95%置信区间(CI)上限<15%,则确定布地奈德对照品与布地奈德对照品的非劣效性。次要结局检查了哮喘相关住院率和不良事件(AE)。结果:布地奈德比较剂组和参比组均包括3109例患者。哮喘急性发作患者比例的调整后的较高95%CI为0.035(3.5%),表明无自卑感。队列的哮喘发作率(校正比率[RR] = 1.04,95%CI:0.95-1.14)或哮喘相关住院率(校正RR = 1.10,95%CI:0.99-1.24)没有显着差异。调整基线混杂因素后。结果期间,布地奈德对照患者中的72.9%和布地奈德参考患者中的71.8%没有哮喘恶化。在布地奈德比较人群中,没有发生与哮喘相关的住院治疗;在布地奈德比较人群中,这一比例为77.9%;在布地奈德参考人群中,为79.0%。最常见的不良事件是喉咙刺激(≤0.4%的患者)和声音嘶哑/声s(0.02%的患者)。治疗队列之间的不良事件无显着差异。结论:在这项现实生活研究中,布地奈德比较剂相对于参考药物的非劣效性达到了哮喘急性发作率的主要终点。在两个治疗队列中,哮喘相关的住院和不良事件发生率没有差异。布地奈德比较剂是治疗哮喘急性发作的有效且安全的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号