首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Internet Treatment for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician Assistance
【24h】

Internet Treatment for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician Assistance

机译:互联网治疗抑郁症的比较:临床医生与技术人员协助的随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for depression is effective when guided by a clinician, less so if unguided. Question: Would guidance from a technician be as effective as guidance from a clinician? Method Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing three groups: Clinician-assisted vs. technician-assisted vs. delayed treatment. Community-based volunteers applied to the VirtualClinic (www.virtualclinic.org.au) research program, and 141 participants with major depressive disorder were randomized. Participants in the clinician- and technician-assisted groups received access to an iCBT program for depression comprising 6 online lessons, weekly homework assignments, and weekly supportive contact over a treatment period of 8 weeks. Participants in the clinician-assisted group also received access to a moderated online discussion forum. The main outcome measures were the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9). Completion rates were high, and at post-treatment, both treatment groups reduced scores on the BDI-II (p0.001) and PHQ-9 (p0.001) compared to the delayed treatment group but did not differ from each other. Within group effect sizes on the BDI-II were 1.27 and 1.20 for the clinician- and technician-assisted groups respectively, and on the PHQ-9, were 1.54 and 1.60 respectively. At 4-month follow-up participants in the technician group had made further improvements and had significantly lower scores on the PHQ-9 than those in the clinician group. A total of approximately 60 minutes of clinician or technician time was required per participant during the 8-week treatment program. Conclusions Both clinician- and technician-assisted treatment resulted in large effect sizes and clinically significant improvements comparable to those associated with face-to-face treatment, while a delayed treatment control group did not improve. These results provide support for large scale trials to determine the clinical effectiveness and acceptability of technician-assisted iCBT programs for depression. This form of treatment has potential to increase the capacity of existing mental health services. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000559213.
机译:背景技术基于互联网的抑郁症认知行为疗法(iCBT)在临床医生的指导下是有效的,如果没有指导,则效果较差。问题:技术人员的指导与临床医生的指导一样有效吗?方法随机对照非劣效性试验比较三组:临床医生协助与技术员协助与延迟治疗。以社区为基础的志愿者申请了VirtualClinic(www.virtualclinic.org.au)研究计划,并将141名患有严重抑郁症的参与者随机分组。临床和技术人员协助小组的参与者可以参加iCBT抑郁症计划,包括6堂在线课程,每周一次的家庭作业以及每周为期8周的支持性接触。临床医生协助小组的参与者还可以访问主持的在线讨论论坛。主要结局指标为贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)和患者健康问卷9项(PHQ-9)。完成率很高,并且在治疗后,与延迟治疗组相比,两个治疗组的BDI-II(p <0.001)和PHQ-9(p <0.001)得分均降低,但彼此之间没有差异。在小组内,临床医师和技术人员辅助小组对BDI-II的影响大小分别为1.27和1.20,而在PHQ-9上,对BDI-II的影响大小分别为1.54和1.60。在4个月的随访中,技术人员组的参与者取得了进一步的进步,在PHQ-9上的得分明显低于临床医生组。在8周的治疗计划中,每个参与者总共需要大约60分钟的临床医生或技术人员时间。结论临床医生和技术人员辅助的治疗均能产生与面对面治疗相当的效果,并在临床上有显着改善,而延迟治疗对照组则无改善。这些结果为大规模试验的确定提供了支持,以确定临床技术和由技术人员辅助的iCBT抑郁症治疗计划的可接受性。这种治疗形式有可能增加现有精神卫生服务的能力。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12609000559213。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号