首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas—A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group
【24h】

Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas—A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group

机译:胰腺开放性手术与微创坏死坏死切除术的比较—德国胰腺炎研究组的回顾性多中心分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Necrotising pancreatitis, and particularly infected necrosis, are still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Since 2011, a step-up approach with lower morbidity rates compared to initial open necrosectomy has been established. However, mortality and complication rates of this complex treatment are hardly studied thereafter. Methods The German Pancreatitis Study Group performed a multicenter, retrospective study including 220 patients with necrotising pancreatitis requiring intervention, treated at 10 hospitals in Germany between January 2008 and June 2014. Data were analysed for the primary endpoints "severe complications" and "mortality" as well as secondary endpoints including "length of hospital stay", "follow up", and predisposing or prognostic factors. Results Of all patients 13.6% were treated primarily with surgery and 86.4% underwent a step-up approach. More men (71.8%) required intervention for necrotising pancreatitis. The most frequent etiology was biliary (41.4%) followed by alcohol (29.1%). Compared to open necrosectomy, the step-up approach was associated with a lower number of severe complications (primary composite endpoint including sepsis, persistent multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and erosion bleeding: 44.7% vs. 73.3%), lower mortality (10.5% vs. 33.3%) and lower rates of diabetes mellitus type 3c (4.7% vs. 33.3%). Low hematocrit and low blood urea nitrogen at admission as well as a history of acute pancreatitis were prognostic for less complications in necrotising pancreatitis. A combination of drainage with endoscopic necrosectomy resulted in the lowest rate of severe complications. Conclusion A step-up approach starting with minimal invasive drainage techniques and endoscopic necrosectomy results in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality in necrotising pancreatitis compared to a primarily surgical intervention.
机译:背景坏死性胰腺炎,尤其是感染性坏死,仍与高发病率和高死亡率有关。自2011年以来,已经建立了一种与初次开放性坏死性切除术相比发病率更低的加深治疗方法。然而,此后几乎没有研究这种复杂治疗的死亡率和并发症发生率。方法德国胰腺炎研究小组于2008年1月至2014年6月在德国的10家医院进行了一项包括220例需要干预的坏死性胰腺炎患者的多中心回顾性研究。分析了主要终点“严重并发症”和“死亡率”的数据。以及次要终点,包括“住院时间”,“随访”以及易感因素或预后因素。结果在所有患者中,有13.6%的患者主要接受外科手术治疗,而86.4%的患者接受了逐步治疗。坏死性胰腺炎需要更多男性干预(71.8%)。最常见的病因是胆汁(41.4%),其次是酒精(29.1%)。与开放性坏死切除术相比,加深法的并发症更少(主要复合终点包括败血症,持续性多器官功能不全综合征(MODS)和糜烂出血:44.7%vs. 73.3%),较低的死亡率(10.5%)对比33.3%)和3c型糖尿病(4.7%比33.3%)更低。入院时低血细胞比容和低血尿素氮以及急性胰腺炎病史预示着坏死性胰腺炎的并发症较少。引流与内镜坏死切除术相结合可导致最低的严重并发症发生率。结论与主要的外科手术干预相比,从微创引流技术和内窥镜坏死切除术开始的逐步治疗方法可显着降低坏死性胰腺炎的发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号