首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Skill Set or Mind Set? Associations between Health Literacy, Patient Activation and Health
【24h】

Skill Set or Mind Set? Associations between Health Literacy, Patient Activation and Health

机译:技能集还是思维集?健康素养,患者激活与健康之间的关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective There is ongoing debate on whether health literacy represents a skill-based construct for health self-management, or if it also more broadly captures personal ‘activation’ or motivation to manage health. This research examines 1) the association between patient activation and health literacy as they are most commonly measured and 2) the independent and combined associations of patient activation and health literacy skills with physical and mental health. Methods A secondary analysis of baseline cross-sectional data from the LitCog cohort of older adults was used. Participants (n = 697) were recruited from multiple US-based health centers. During structured face-to-face interviews, participants completed the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), the SF-36 physical health summary subscale, and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Service (PROMIS) short form subscales for depression and anxiety. Results The relationship between health literacy and patient activation was weak, but significant (r = 0.11, p0.01). In models adjusted for participant characteristics, lower health literacy was associated with worse physical health (β = 0.13, p0.001) and depression (β = −0.16, p0.001). Lower patient activation was associated with worse physical health (β = 0.19, p0.001), depression (β = −0.27, p0.001) and anxiety (β-0.24, p0.001). Conclusions The most common measures of health literacy and patient activation are weakly correlated with each other, but also independently correlated with health outcomes. This suggests health literacy represents a distinct skill-based construct, supporting the Institute of Medicine’s definition. Deficits in either construct could be useful targets for behavioral intervention.
机译:目标有关健康素养是否代表基于技能的健康自我管理构架,还是它更广泛地体现了个人“激活”或管理健康的动机,目前仍在争论。这项研究检查了1)患者激活和健康素养之间的关联,因为它们是最常用的衡量方法; 2)患者激活和健康素养技能与身心健康之间的独立关联组合。方法对来自老年人的LitCog队列的基线横截面数据进行二次分析。参与者(n = 697)是从多个美国健康中心招募的。在结构化的面对面访谈中,参与者完成了成人功能健康素养测试(TOFHLA),患者激活措施(PAM),SF-36身体健康摘要量表和患者报告的结果测量信息服务(PROMIS)抑郁和焦虑的简短形式的量表。结果健康素养与患者活化之间的关系较弱,但显着(r = 0.11,p <0.01)。在针对参与者特征进行调整的模型中,较低的健康素养与身体状况较差(β= 0.13,p <0.001)和抑郁(β= -0.16,p <0.001)相关。患者活化度降低与身体健康状况恶化(β= 0.19,p <0.001),抑郁症(β= -0.27,p <0.001)和焦虑症(β-0.24,p <0.001)有关。结论最常见的健康素养和患者激活措施之间的联系较弱,但与健康结局之间却独立相关。这表明健康素养代表了一种独特的基于技能的建构,支持了医学研究所的定义。两种结构的缺陷都可能是行为干预的有用目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号