...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
【24h】

Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

机译:为什么当前的出版实践可能扭曲科学

获取原文

摘要

This essay makes the underlying assumption that scientific information is an economic commodity, and that scientific journals are a medium for its dissemination and exchange. While this exchange system differs from a conventional market in many senses, including the nature of payments, it shares the goal of transferring the commodity (knowledge) from its producers (scientists) to its consumers (other scientists, administrators, physicians, patients, and funding agencies). The function of this system has major consequences. Idealists may be offended that research be compared to widgets, but realists will acknowledge that journals generate revenue; publications are critical in drug development and marketing and to attract venture capital; and publishing defines successful scientific careers. Economic modelling of science may yield important insights (Table 1).
机译:本文假设科学信息是一种经济商品,科学期刊是其传播和交流的媒介。尽管这种交换系统在很多方面都与常规市场不同,包括支付的性质,但它的目标是将商品(知识)从生产者(科学家)转移到消费者(其他科学家,管理人员,医师,患者和资助机构)。该系统的功能具有重大影响。理想主义者可能会冒犯将研究与小部件进行比较的想法,但是现实主义者会承认期刊会产生收益;出版物对于药物开发和营销以及吸引风险投资至关重要;出版定义了成功的科学事业。科学的经济建模可能会产生重要的见解(表1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号