首页> 外文期刊>Policy and Society >Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia
【24h】

Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia

机译:决策者对社会研究感兴趣吗?探索澳大利亚公务员中有价值信息的来源和使用

获取原文
           

摘要

Highlights ? New data are analysed from an Australian survey of state and federal public servants ( N =2084). ? The article explores their capacity to use external sources of expertise in policy work. ? Organisational cultures and practices are found to be very important for research use. ? Policy and research skills of staff are variable and substantially learned on the job. ? Policy pressures and political contexts are seen to affect research use. Abstract This article explores the use of research and expertise within a selection of government agencies at state and federal levels in Australia. A recent survey of public officials provides new data on the reported use of evidence and expertise sourced from within the public service and from external sources. The survey instrument targeted the policy, program and evaluation staff in human service agencies and central policy coordination agencies. The survey findings provide new information on public servants’ policy skills and organisational context, their attitudes to non-government sources of expert evidence and knowledge, and their perceptions of the relevance of academic social research. Data are reported on the relative importance assigned by public officials in state and federal agencies to various sources of expert information. Factors that hinder and facilitate the uptake of external research by policy-related officials are canvassed, with special attention to organisational cultures and practices. Some similarities and differences between types of agencies are noted, especially those between state-level and federal agencies. The broader political context of policy work is also highlighted.
机译:强调 ?根据澳大利亚对州和联邦公务员的调查(N = 2084)分析了新数据。 ?本文探讨了他们在政策工作中使用外部专业知识资源的能力。 ?发现组织文化和实践对于研究用途非常重要。 ?员工的政策和研究技能是可变的,并且在工作中会学到很多。 ?政策压力和政治环境被认为会影响研究的使用。摘要本文探讨了澳大利亚各州和联邦各级政府机构中研究和专业知识的使用。最近对公职人员进行的调查提供了有关报告的从公共服务机构内部和外部来源使用的证据和专业知识的使用的新数据。该调查工具针对的是人类服务机构和中央政策协调机构中的政策,计划和评估人员。调查结果提供了有关公务员的政策技巧和组织背景,他们对非政府专家证据和知识来源的态度以及他们对学术社会研究的相关性的看法的新信息。报告了有关州和联邦机构的公职人员对各种专家信息来源的相对重要性的数据。讨论了阻碍和促进政策相关官员进行外部研究的因素,并特别注意组织的文化和实践。指出了机构类型之间的某些异同,尤其是州级和联邦机构之间的异同。还强调了政策工作的广泛政治背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号