首页> 外文期刊>SA Journal of Radiology >Is computed tomography of the head justified in patients with minor head trauma presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale 15/15?
【24h】

Is computed tomography of the head justified in patients with minor head trauma presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale 15/15?

机译:格拉斯哥昏迷评分为15/15的轻度头部外伤患者的头部计算机断层扫描是否合理?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: ?In keeping with radiology departments in tertiary referral hospitals in developing countries offering computed tomography (CT) head scan services, the radiology department at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) in the Western Cape of South Africa undertakes several such scans annually. Of these scans, many are undertaken for post-trauma patients with minor head injury (MHI). While there is agreement that MHI patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 13–14/15 may well benefit, there is doubt as to the clinical utility of routine CT head scanning in MHI patients with GCS scores of 15/15. Objectives: ?This retrospective descriptive study of patient records was undertaken to determine the frequency and clinical significance of any abnormalities found on CT head scans of 460 patients with MHI and GCS scores of 15/15, scanned at GSH between 2012 and 2014. Method: ?Ethical clearance was obtained and the records of 460 MHI patients with GCS scores of 15/15, loss of consciousness (LOC) and amnesia who underwent CT head scanning at GSH between 2012 and 2014 were then retrieved from the Philips picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Patient records, containing illegible referral forms or technically inadequate CT head scans, were excluded from the study. Patients’ biographical, clinical and CT head scan data were entered into sequentially numbered data collection forms. These data were tabulated and summed as percentage distributions. Patients’ CT head scan findings were reviewed and classified as either showing normal or abnormal features. Abnormalities detected on CT head scans were classified as being either clinically significant or clinically non-significant. Results: ?Referral forms and CT scan reports were obtained for 460 MHI patients from a sample of 497 patients, calculated by using the equation for estimating a single proportion from a large sample (precision 1.5%). The sample obtained yielded an acceptable response rate of 460/497 (92.6%). Of 460 (100%) scan reports, 320 (69.6%) showed no abnormality, while 140 (30.4%) showed abnormality. Of the 140 abnormal scans, 107 (23.3%) showed clinically non-significant abnormality, while 33 (7.2%) revealed clinically significant abnormality. Twenty-two (4.8%) of these clinically significant scans showed brain contusion and 11(2.4%) showed skull fracture. No subdural or extradural haematoma, shift or herniation were reported and none of the 33 patients whose CT scans showed clinically significant abnormality underwent urgent neurosurgical intervention. Conclusion: ?Of the 460 CT head scans performed at GSH for MHI with LOC but normal GCS between 2012 and 2014, none required urgent neurosurgical intervention. This is in accordance with the 2012 Kimberley Hospital Rule (KHR), a management protocol which indicates that CT head scanning in patients with MHI and GCS scores of 15/15 can safely be delayed for 8 h. An audit of the records of patients excluded from this study coupled with an analysis of data from other Western Cape hospital CT head scan databases could help ensure that this scarce resource is used cost-beneficially for all head-injured patients in the Western Cape catchment area.
机译:背景:?与发展中国家提供计算机断层扫描(CT)头部扫描服务的三级转诊医院的放射科保持一致,南非西开普省Groote Schuur医院(GSH)的放射科每年进行几次此类扫描。在这些扫描中,许多是针对颅脑轻伤(MHI)的创伤后患者进行的。尽管人们普遍认为格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)评分为13–14 / 15的MHI患者可能会受益,但对于GCS评分为15/15的MHI患者,常规CT头颅扫描的临床实用性仍存在疑问。目的:这项对患者记录的回顾性描述性研究旨在确定2012年至2014年间在GSH扫描的460例MHI和GCS得分为15/15的患者的CT头颅扫描发现的任何异常的频率和临床意义。获得伦理学依据,然后从飞利浦图片归档和通讯系统中检索到460名MCS患者的记录,这些患者的GCS评分为15/15,意识丧失(LOC)和失忆症在2012年至2014年间在GSH进行了CT头扫描。 (PACS)。该研究排除了患者记录,包括难以理解的转诊表格或技术上不足的CT头颅扫描。将患者的传记,临床和CT头颅扫描数据输入到顺序编号的数据收集表中。将这些数据制成表格并汇总为百分比分布。对患者的CT头颅扫描结果进行了审查并归类为显示正常或异常特征。在CT头扫描中检测到的异常被分类为临床上显着或临床上不显着。结果:从497名患者的样本中获得了460例MHI患者的推荐表格和CT扫描报告,通过使用方程式估算大样本(精确度为1.5%)的单个比例来计算。获得的样品的可接受响应率为460/497(92.6%)。在460张(100%)扫描报告中,有320张(69.6%)未显示异常,而140张(30.4%)未显示异常。在140次异常扫描中,有107次(23.3%)显示出临床上无明显异常,而33次(7.2%)显示出临床上有明显异常。这些临床显着扫描中有二十二例(4.8%)显示脑挫裂伤,而十一例(2.4%)显示颅骨骨折。没有报道硬膜下或硬膜外血肿,移位或突出,并且33例CT扫描显示临床上明显异常的患者均未接受紧急神经外科手术治疗。结论:2012年至2014年间,在GSH对MHI伴LOC但GCS正常的460例CT头部扫描中,没有一项需要紧急的神经外科手术干预。这符合2012年《金伯利医院规则》(KHR)的管理协议,该管理协议表明,对于MHI和GCS评分为15/15的患者,CT头扫描可以安全地延迟8小时。对这项研究中排除的患者记录进行审核,再加上对其他西开普省医院CT头颅扫描数据库的数据进行的分析,可以帮助确保以节省成本的方式将这种稀缺资源用于西开普集水区的所有头部受伤患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号