...
首页> 外文期刊>Parasites Vectors >Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard

机译:ELISA,IFAT和Western blot在没有金标准的贝叶斯分析中检测猫抗婴儿利什曼原虫抗体的诊断性能

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundAnti- Leishmania antibodies are increasingly investigated in cats for epidemiological studies or for the diagnosis of clinical feline leishmaniosis. The immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB) are the serological tests more frequently used. The aim of the present study was to assess diagnostic performance of IFAT, ELISA and WB to detect anti- L. infantum antibodies in feline serum samples obtained from endemic ( n =?76) and non-endemic ( n =?64) areas and from cats affected by feline leishmaniosis ( n =?21) by a Bayesian approach without a gold standard. MethodsCut-offs were set at 80 titre for IFAT and 40 ELISA units for ELISA. WB was considered positive in presence of at least a 18 KDa band. Statistical analysis was performed through a written routine with MATLAB software in the Bayesian framework. The latent data and observations from the joint posterior were simulated in the Bayesian approach by an iterative Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique using the Gibbs sampler for estimating sensitivity and specificity of the three tests. ResultsThe median seroprevalence in the sample used for evaluating the performance of tests was estimated at 0.27 [credible interval (CI)?=?0.20–0.34]. The median sensitivity of the three different methods was 0.97 (CI: 0.86–1.00), 0.75 (CI: 0.61–0.87) and 0.70 (CI: 0.56–0.83) for WB, IFAT and ELISA, respectively. Median specificity reached 0.99 (CI: 0.96–1.00) with WB, 0.97 (CI: 0.93–0.99) with IFAT and 0.98 (CI: 0.94–1.00) with ELISA. IFAT was more sensitive than ELISA (75 vs 70%) for the detection of subclinical infection while ELISA was better for diagnosing clinical leishmaniosis when compared with IFAT (98 vs 97%). ConclusionsThe overall performance of all serological techniques was good and the most accurate test for anti- Leishmania antibody detection in feline serum samples was WB.
机译:背景技术在猫中越来越多地研究抗利什曼原虫抗体用于流行病学研究或临床猫利什曼病的诊断。免疫荧光抗体检测(IFAT),酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和蛋白质印迹(WB)是更常用的血清学检测。本研究的目的是评估IFAT,ELISA和WB的诊断性能,以检测从地方性(n = 76)和非地方性(n = 64)地区获得的猫血清样品中的婴儿乳杆菌抗体。通过没有金标准的贝叶斯方法从受猫利什曼病(n =?21)影响的猫身上提取。方法将IFAT的滴度定为80滴度,将ELISA的滴度设定为40 ELISA单位。在至少18 KDa的条带下,WB被认为是阳性的。使用贝叶斯框架中的MATLAB软件通过书面例程进行统计分析。联合后验的潜在数据和观察结果采用贝叶斯方法,通过迭代马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗技术,使用Gibbs采样器进行模拟,以评估这三种测试的敏感性和特异性。结果用于评估测试性能的样本中血清阳性率的中位数估计为0.27 [可信区间(CI)?=?0.20–0.34]。对于WB,IFAT和ELISA,三种不同方法的中位灵敏度分别为0.97(CI:0.86-1.00),0.75(CI:0.61-0.87)和0.70(CI:0.56-0.83)。 WB的中位特异性达到0.99(CI:0.96–1.00),IFAT的中位特异性达到0.97(CI:0.93–0.99),ELISA的中位特异性达到0.98(CI:0.94–1.00)。与IFAT相比,IFAT对亚临床感染的检测比ELISA更为灵敏(75比70%),而ELISA在诊断临床利什曼病方面则更好(98比97%)。结论所有血清学技术的整体性能均良好,猫血清样品中抗Leishmania抗体检测最准确的方法是WB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号