首页> 外文期刊>Perioperative Medicine >Significant discrepancies exist between clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of functional capacity by validated scoring tools during preoperative evaluation
【24h】

Significant discrepancies exist between clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of functional capacity by validated scoring tools during preoperative evaluation

机译:在术前评估过程中,临床医生评估与经过验证的评分工具对患者的功能能力自我评估之间存在显着差异

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Preoperative assessment of functional capacity is necessary to direct decisions regarding cardiac evaluation and may help identify patients at high risk for perioperative complications. Patient self-triage regarding functional capacity could be useful for discerning which patients benefit from a clinician evaluation at a Preoperative Evaluation Center prior to the day of surgery. We evaluated the feasibility of preoperative, patient self-triage regarding functional capacity. Methods Patients were recruited immediately prior to their preoperative evaluation. Study participants completed electronic versions of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS)–Short Form 12a–Physical Function. DASI and PROMIS questionnaire responses were scored and evaluated for correlation with clinician assessments of functional capacity. Correlation was analyzed around the dichotomous outcome of Results After IRB approval, 204 patients were enrolled and completed both DASI and PROMIS questionnaires. Clinicians assessed functional capacity at 2 0.76). The mean and standard deviation for PROMIS T-scores were 43.3 and 9.86, respectively (mean 50.0; SD 10.0 for the general population). Of the 203 patients who completed the entire study survey, 192 (94.6?%) stated that they did not require assistance from another person, and 187 (94?%) responded either “agree” or “strongly agree” to the DASI questionnaire being “easy to understand” and “easy to complete;” 186 (93?%) and 188 (94?%), respectively, responded similarly to the PROMIS questionnaire. Conclusions While both electronic questionnaires were easy to understand and complete for most study participants, there was a significant discrepancy between clinician assessments and patient self-assessments of functional capacity. Further study is needed to determine if either patient self-triage by means of activity questionnaires or clinician evaluation is valid and reliable in the preoperative setting.
机译:背景技术术前功能能力评估对于指导有关心脏评估的决策至关重要,并且可能有助于确定围手术期并发症高风险的患者。关于功能能力的患者自我分类可能有助于辨别哪些患者在手术当天之前从术前评估中心的临床医生评估中受益。我们评估了术前,患者自我分类有关功能能力的可行性。方法在术前评估之前立即招募患者。研究参与者完成了电子版本的杜克活动状态指数(DASI)和患者报告的结果测量系统(PROMIS)–简短表格12a –身体功能。对DASI和PROMIS问卷的回答进行评分,并评估其与临床医师对功能能力的评估的相关性。结果的二分结果周围的相关性进行了分析。IRB批准后,纳入了204位患者并完成了DASI和PROMIS问卷。临床医生评估的功能能力为2 0.76)。 PROMIS T评分的平均值和标准差分别为43.3和9.86(平均值为50.0;一般人群为SD 10.0)。在完成整个研究调查的203位患者中,有192位(94.6%)表示他们不需要其他人的帮助,而187位(94 %%)对DASI调查问卷的回答是“同意”或“强烈同意”。 “易于理解”和“易于完成”; PROMIS问卷的回答分别为186(93%)和188(94%)。结论虽然大多数研究参与者都容易理解和填写两种电子问卷,但临床医生的评估与患者对功能能力的自我评估之间存在显着差异。需要进行进一步的研究,以确定通过活动问卷或临床医生评估进行的患者自我分类在术前是否有效和可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号