...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Medical Education >Evaluating the impact of interactive and entertaining educational conferences
【24h】

Evaluating the impact of interactive and entertaining educational conferences

机译:评估互动性和娱乐性教育会议的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Adult learning theory suggests that meaningful engagement impacts learning. To evaluate the impact of resident-led interactive conferences on satisfaction, engagement and knowledge acquisition. A prospective study at a paediatric academic institution compared educational conferences in two formats. Control conferences were PowerPoint? lectures and intervention conferences included multimedia, audience participation and faculty mentorship. Learner and presenter satisfaction and learner engagement were assessed by post-conference surveys. Knowledge was assessed via pre- and post-conference open-ended questions; matched pre- and post-questions were analyzed. Control and intervention groups’ satisfaction and engagement were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Comparison of proportion of learners with improved post-conference knowledge score was analyzed with the Chi square test. There were 181 control and 170 intervention surveys collected. Learners’ median satisfaction (4 vs. 5, p?=?.03) and engagement (4 vs. 5, p??.01) ratings improved in the intervention group. Presenters rated audience engagement higher during the intervention conferences (median 3 vs. 4, p?=?.01). Knowledge acquisition, compared for matched surveys only, was not significantly different between the groups. Learner and presenter satisfaction and learner engagement were higher for the interactive format. While knowledge acquisition was unchanged, greater satisfaction encourages the use of interactive conferences.
机译:成人学习理论表明有意义的参与会影响学习。评估居民主导的互动会议对满意度,参与度和知识获取的影响。儿科学术机构的一项前瞻性研究比较了两种形式的教育会议。控制会议是PowerPoint吗?讲座和干预会议包括多媒体,听众参与和教师指导。通过会后调查评估学习者和演示者的满意度以及学习者的参与度。通过会前和会后开放式问题评估知识;对匹配的问题前后进行分析。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较了对照组和干预组的满意度和参与度。使用卡方检验分析具有提高的会后知识得分的学习者比例的比较。收集了181个对照和170个干预调查。干预组的学习者中位满意度(4比5,p?= ?. 03)和参与度(4 vs. 5,p?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号