首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics Neonatology >Comparisons between Full-time and Part-time Pediatric Emergency Physicians in Pediatric Emergency Department
【24h】

Comparisons between Full-time and Part-time Pediatric Emergency Physicians in Pediatric Emergency Department

机译:儿科急诊科专职和兼职儿科急诊医师的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Pediatric emergency medicine is a young field that has established itself in recent decades. Many unanswered questions remain regarding how to deliver better pediatric emergency care. The implementation of full-time pediatric emergency physicians is a quality improvement strategy for child care in Taiwan. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of care under different physician coverage models in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: The medical records of 132,398 patients visiting the pediatric ED of a tertiary care university hospital during January 2004 to December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Full-time pediatric emergency physicians are the group specializing in the pediatric emergency medicine, and they only work in the pediatric ED. Part-time pediatricians specializing in other subspecialties also can work an extra shift in the pediatric ED, with the majority working in their inpatient and outpatient services. We compared quality performance indicators, including: mortality rate, the 72-hour return visit rate, length of stay, admission rate, and the rate of being kept for observation between full-time and part-time pediatric emergency physicians. Results: An average of 3678 +/- 125 [mean +/- standard error (SE)] visits per month (with a range of 2487-6646) were observed. The trends in quality of care, observed monthly, indicated that the 72-hour return rate was 2-6% and length of stay in the ED decreased from 11.5 hours to 3.2 hours over the study period. The annual mortality rate within 48 hours of admission to the ED increased from 0.04% to 0.05% and then decreased to 0.02%, and the overall mortality rate dropped from 0.13% to 0.07%. Multivariate analyses indicated that there was no change in the 72-hour return visit rate for full-time pediatric emergency physicians; they were more likely to admit and keep patients for observation [odds ratio = 1.43 and odds ratio = 1.71, respectively], and these results were similar to those of senior physicians. Conclusion: Full-time pediatric emergency physicians in the pediatric ED decreased the mortality rate and length of stay in the ED, but had no change in the 72-hour return visit rate. This pilot study shows that the quality of care in pediatric ED after the implementation of full-time pediatric emergency physicians needs further evaluation.
机译:背景:儿科急诊医学是一个新兴领域,近几十年来已经确立了自己的地位。关于如何提供更好的儿科急诊服务,许多悬而未决的问题仍然存在。在台湾,全职儿科急诊医师的实施是提高儿童保育质量的战略。这项研究的目的是评估儿科急诊科(ED)在不同医师覆盖率模型下的护理质量。方法:回顾性分析了2004年1月至2006年12月间132 398名就诊于三级大学医院儿科急诊科的患者的病历。专职于儿科急诊科的专职儿科急诊医师,他们仅在儿科急诊科工作。专职于其他亚专业的兼职儿科医生也可以在儿科急诊室进行额外的轮班,其中大部分工作在其住院和门诊服务中。我们比较了质量绩效指标,包括:死亡率,72小时回访率,住院时间,入院率以及专职和兼职儿科急诊医师之间的观察率。结果:每月平均访问3678 +/- 125 [平均+/-标准误差(SE)](范围为2487-6646)。每月观察到的护理质量趋势表明,在整个研究期间,72小时的返回率为2-6%,在ED的住院时间从11.5小时减少到3.2小时。急诊入院48小时内的年死亡率从0.04%增加到0.05%,然后下降到0.02%,总死亡率从0.13%下降到0.07%。多因素分析表明,专职儿科急诊医师的72小时回访率没有变化。他们更有可能接纳患者并进行观察[赔率比分别为1.43和优势比= 1.71],这些结果与高级医生的结果相似。结论:儿科急诊科的专职儿科急诊医师降低了急诊室的死亡率和住院时间,但72小时回访率没有变化。这项初步研究表明,在专职儿科急诊医师实施后,小儿急诊的护理质量需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号