首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics Neonatology >Early appendectomy shortens antibiotic course and hospital stay in children with early perforated appendicitis
【24h】

Early appendectomy shortens antibiotic course and hospital stay in children with early perforated appendicitis

机译:早期阑尾切除术可缩短早期穿孔性阑尾炎儿童的抗生素疗程并缩短住院时间

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The optimal management of perforated appendicitis in the pediatric population has been controversial. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy between conservative treatment (CS) and early appendectomy (EA) in pediatric perforated appendicitis, and to determine whether surgical intervention is an optimal treatment modality for early perforated appendicitis in children. Methods: Patients treated between January 2012 and April 2014, aged 0-18 years, with an imaging-based diagnosis of perforated appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into nonabscess and abscess groups by image findings, and were further categorized into CS and EA groups by treatment modality. Early perforated appendicitis was defined as having duration of symptoms@?7 days, C-reactive protein level@?200 mg/L, maximum abscess diameter@?5 cm, and absence of general peritonitis, and unstable vital signs. The clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were compared between CS and EA in each group. Results: A total of 326 patients had confirmed appendicitis, including 116 patients with an image diagnosis of perforation. The CS group had a significantly longer duration of symptoms, larger abscesses, and higher serum C-reactive protein levels at presentation (all p<0.05). Patients in the EA group had a shorter antibiotic course and length of hospitalization, and a lower rate of antibiotic escalation than those in the CS group (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.05, respectively). In patients with early perforated appendicitis, the CS and EA groups showed no difference in baseline disease severity. Patients in the EA group also had a shorter antibiotic course and length of hospitalization than those in the CS group (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Compared with CS, EA shortens the antibiotic course and hospital stay in pediatric early perforated appendicitis, even in the presence of small abscesses.
机译:背景:小儿穿孔性阑尾炎的最佳治疗方法一直存在争议。这项研究旨在比较保守治疗(CS)和早期阑尾切除术(EA)在小儿穿孔性阑尾炎中的疗效,并确定手术干预是否是儿童早期穿孔阑尾炎的最佳治疗方式。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年4月之间0-18岁,以影像学诊断为穿孔性阑尾炎的患者。根据影像学发现将患者分为非脓肿组和脓肿组,并根据治疗方式将其进一步分为CS组和EA组。早期穿孔性阑尾炎的定义为:症状持续时间≤7天,C反应蛋白水平≤200mg / L,最大脓肿直径≤5cm,无一般性腹膜炎,生命体征不稳定。比较每组CS和EA的临床特征和治疗效果。结果:总共326例确诊为阑尾炎的患者,其中116例诊断为穿孔的患者。 CS组出现时症状持续时间明显延长,脓肿更大,血清C反应蛋白水平更高(所有p <0.05)。与CS组相比,EA组患者的抗生素疗程和住院时间短,抗生素升级率较低(分别为p <0.001,p <0.001和p <0.05)。在患有早期穿孔性阑尾炎的患者中,CS和EA组的基线疾病严重程度无差异。 EA组患者的抗生素疗程和住院时间也比CS组短(分别为p <0.001和p <0.001)。结论:与CS相比,EA可以缩短小儿早期穿孔性阑尾炎的抗生素疗程和住院时间,即使存在小的脓肿也是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号