首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Clinical Research >Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study

机译:二甲双胍-维达列汀与二甲双胍-格列美脲合用在二甲双胍单药治疗控制不充分的2型糖尿病患者中最常用剂量的疗效和安全性比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim and Objective: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Materials and Methods: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients with uncomplicated T2DM, on treatment with MF for 4 months out of which on maximum tolerated dose of MF (1000-2500 mg/day) for 4 weeks, glycosylated Haemoglobin [HbA1c]) ≥6.5%, fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥126 mg/dl and post prandial glucose (PPG) ≥200 mg/dl were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive MF (500 mg BD) + VG (50 mg BD) or MF (500 mg BD) + GP (2 mg BD). Results: Both the groups caused significant decline in blood glucose levels both FBG as well as PPG levels (P P P P > 0.05). At the end of the study, both liver functions tests and renal functions tests remained unaltered statistically and within normal clinical range in both the groups (P > 0.05). However, hypoglycemia and other adverse events were numerically more in MF + GP group. Conclusion: Both the regimens on comparison revealed similar efficacy and safety thereby failing to prove superiority over each other.
机译:目的和目的:目的是评估和比较二甲双胍-维格列汀(MF-VG)和二甲双胍-格列美脲(MF-GP)联合治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效和安全性。资料和方法:对没有并发症的T2DM患者进行了一项比较随机的开放标签试验,接受MF治疗4个月,其中最大耐受剂量的MF(糖化血红蛋白[1000-2500 mg / day] 4周)[ HbA1c])≥6.5%,空腹血糖(FBG)≥126mg / dl和餐后血糖(PPG)≥200mg / dl纳入研究。患者被随机接受MF(500 mg BD)+ VG(50 mg BD)或MF(500 mg BD)+ GP(2 mg BD)。结果:两组均导致FBG和PPG水平均显着下降(P P P P> 0.05)。在研究结束时,两组肝功能检查和肾功能检查均无统计学变化,且在正常临床范围内(P> 0.05)。但是,MF + GP组的低血糖症和其他不良事件在数量上更多。结论:两种比较方案均显示出相似的疗效和安全性,因此未能证明彼此具有优越性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号