首页> 外文期刊>PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO >Anti-Neoliberal Struggles in the 21st Century: Gramsci Revised
【24h】

Anti-Neoliberal Struggles in the 21st Century: Gramsci Revised

机译:21世纪的反神经斗争:葛兰西修订

获取原文
       

摘要

The dominance of neoliberalism in the past three decades suggests the capacity of capitalism to adapt and restructure itself in periods of crisis and to curb progressive movements that threaten its hegemony. Yet social movements that challenge neoliberalism continue to emerge, sending hopeful signs of its potential demise by ushering in progressive governments that often appear to fall short of expectations. Building off the growing body of research that utilizes Gramscian theory to categorize neoliberalism as a passive revolution, I examine the concept of anti-passive revolution with empirical data to propose a theory of resistance against neoliberalism. The empirical data comes from two movements against neoliberalism: the coalition that challenged the privatization of water in Cochabamba, Bolivia in 2000; and, the movement that challenged the results of the Mexican presidential election in 2006. By examining the trajectories of these movements over a timespan of several years, I identify the empirical conditions for a theory of anti-passive revolution, and the potential for such processes to challenge the hegemony of the passive revolution represented by neoliberalism
机译:在过去的三十年中,新自由主义的统治地位表明,资本主义有能力在危机时期适应和重组自身,并遏制威胁其霸权的进步运动。然而,挑战新自由主义的社会运动不断涌现,通过迎接往往似乎达不到预期的进步政府,发出了其潜在灭亡的希望迹象。在利用格拉姆斯主义理论将新自由主义归为被动革命的研究不断发展的基础上,我用经验数据研究了反被动革命的概念,提出了对新自由主义的抵抗理论。经验数据来自两个反对新自由主义的运动:2000年,联盟挑战了玻利维亚科恰班巴的水私有化;以及挑战2006年墨西哥总统大选结果的运动。通过考察这些运动历时数年的轨迹,我确定了反被动革命理论的经验条件,以及这种过程的潜力挑战以新自由主义为代表的被动革命的霸权

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号