首页> 外文期刊>Particle Fibre Toxicology >Nanotoxicity comparison of four amphiphilic polymeric micelles with similar hydrophilic or hydrophobic structure
【24h】

Nanotoxicity comparison of four amphiphilic polymeric micelles with similar hydrophilic or hydrophobic structure

机译:四个具有相似亲水或疏水结构的两亲聚合物胶束的纳米毒性比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Nanocarriers represent an attractive means of drug delivery, but their biosafety must be established before their use in clinical research. Objectives Four kinds of amphiphilic polymeric (PEG-PG-PCL, PEEP -PCL, PEG-PCL and PEG-DSPE) micelles with similar hydrophilic or hydrophobic structure were prepared and their in vitro and in vivo safety were evaluated and compared. Methods In vitro nanotoxicity evaluations included assessments of cell morphology, cell volume, inflammatory effects, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and membrane fluidity. An umbilical vein cell line (Eahy.926) and a kind of macrophages (J774.A1) were used as cell models considering that intravenous route is dominant for micelle delivery systems. In vivo analyses included complete blood count, lymphocyte subset analysis, detection of plasma inflammatory factors and histological observations of major organs after intravenous administration to KM mice. Results All the micelles enhanced inflammatory molecules in J774.A1 cells, likely resulting from the increased ROS levels. PEG-PG-PCL and PEEP -PCL micelles were found to increase the J774.A1 cell volume. This likely correlated with the size of PEG-PG-PCL micelles and the polyphosphoester structure in PEEP -PCL. PEG-DSPE micelles inhibited the growth of Eahy.926 cells via inducing apoptosis. This might relate to the structure of DSPE, which is a type of phospholipid and has good affinity with cell membrane. No evidence was found for cell membrane changes after treatment with these micelles for 24?h. In the in vivo study, during 8?days of 4 time injection, each of the four nanocarriers altered the hematic phase differently without changes in inflammatory factors or pathological changes in target organs. Conclusions These results demonstrate that the micelles investigated exhibit diverse nanotoxicity correlated with their structures, their biosafety is different in different cell model, and there is no in vitro and in vivo correlation found. We believe that this study will certainly provide more scientific understandings on the nanotoxicity of amphiphilic polymeric micelles.
机译:背景技术纳米载体代表着一种有吸引力的药物输送方式,但是必须在其用于临床研究之前确定其生物安全性。目的制备四种亲水或疏水结构相似的两亲性聚合物胶束(PEG-PG-PCL,PEEP-PCL,PEG-PCL和PEG-DSPE),并评估和比较它们的体外和体内安全性。方法体外纳米毒性评估包括细胞形态,细胞体积,炎症作用,细胞毒性,细胞凋亡和膜流动性的评估。考虑到静脉内途径对胶束递送系统起主导作用,将脐静脉细胞系(Eahy.926)和一种巨噬细胞(J774.A1)用作细胞模型。体内分析包括对KM小鼠静脉内给药后的全血细胞计数,淋巴细胞亚群分析,血浆炎症因子的检测以及主要器官的组织学观察。结果所有胶束均能增强J774.A1细胞中的炎症分子,这可能是由于ROS水平升高所致。发现PEG-PG-PCL和PEEP -PCL胶束增加了J774.A1细胞的体积。这可能与PEG-PG-PCL胶束的大小和PEEP -PCL中的多磷酸酯结构有关。 PEG-DSPE胶束通过诱导细胞凋亡抑制Eahy.926细胞的生长。这可能与DSPE的结构有关,DSPE是一种磷脂,与细胞膜具有良好的亲和力。用这些胶束处理24小时后,没有发现细胞膜发生变化的证据。在体内研究中,在4次注射的8天中,四种纳米载体中的每一种均以不同的方式改变了血液相,而没有炎症因子的改变或靶器官的病理学改变。结论这些结果表明,所研究的胶束具有与其结构相关的各种纳米毒性,在不同的细胞模型中其生物安全性也不同,并且没有发现体内外相关性。我们相信,这项研究无疑将为两亲性聚合物胶束的纳米毒性提供更多的科学理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号