首页> 外文期刊>Patient Safety in Surgery >Missed foot fractures in polytrauma patients: a retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Missed foot fractures in polytrauma patients: a retrospective cohort study

机译:多发伤患者脚部骨折漏诊:一项回顾性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Missed foot fractures are a known problem in the care of the traumatized patient. They do not usually have an influence on the survival, but on the long-term result and the quality of the patient’s life. The aim of this study is to find out how many of these fractures are overlooked in a Level I trauma center and what the consequences for the patients are hypothesing that patients with a delayed diagnosis will have worse clinical results. Methods Forty-seven patients (7.3%) with foot fractures could be identified in 642 polytrauma patients, retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups: early diagnosed fractures and delayed diagnosed fractures, the latter defined as diagnosed after Secondary Survey. Patients were evaluated according to the Hannover Outcome Score, the Short Form-36 Health Survey, the AOFAS Score and the Hannover Scoring System. The average follow-up was 5?years and 8?months. Reasons for overlooking a foot fracture were analyzed. Results The foot fracture was early diagnosed in 26 (55.3%) patients, but delayed in 21 (44.7%). There were no significant differences in the mean stay in the hospital or in the ICU. The fractures that were most often missed were those of the cuboid or the metarsalia. The highest risk factor for a delayed diagnosis was a fracture already diagnosed on the same foot. In 52.4% of the delayed diagosed fractures, an operative therapy was necessary. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical results. Conclusions In summary, the results of this study show that foot injuries can be a safety problem for the patient and the examination of the feet in the trauma room has to be a compulsory part of the algorithm. Although the majority of delayed diagnosed foot fractures demonstrated comparable results to the immediately diagnosed fractures, approximately 10% might have benefited from an earlier diagnosis. Even if there were no significant differences in the clinical results, we have to be aware that missing a fracture in the foot can lead to worse results in the complete polytrauma care.
机译:背景技术脚部骨折是受伤患者护理中的已知问题。它们通常不会影响生存,但会影响患者的长期结果和生活质量。这项研究的目的是找出在I级创伤中心忽略了多少骨折,以及对患者的后果是什么,他们认为诊断延迟的患者的临床效果会更差。方法回顾性分析642例多发伤患者中的47例(7.3%)足部骨折。所有患者分为两组:早期诊断的骨折和延迟诊断的骨折,后者定义为二次检查后确诊。根据汉诺威结果评分,36式简表健康调查,AOFAS评分和汉诺威评分系统对患者进行评估。平均随访时间为5年8个月。分析了忽略脚部骨折的原因。结果足部骨折早期诊断为26例(55.3%),但延迟诊断为21例(44.7%)。在医院或在ICU中的平均住院时间没有显着差异。最常遗漏的骨折是长方体或or骨。延迟诊断的最高风险因素是已经在同一只脚上诊断出的骨折。在52.4%的延迟诊断的骨折中,必须进行手术治疗。两组临床结果无明显差异。结论总之,这项研究的结果表明,脚部受伤可能是患者的安全问题,在创伤室检查脚必须是该算法的强制性部分。尽管大多数延迟诊断的脚部骨折显示出与立即诊断的骨折相当的结果,但大约10%的患者可能从早期诊断中受益。即使临床结果没有显着差异,我们也必须意识到,遗漏脚部骨折可能会导致全面的多创伤护理效果更差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号