首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Patient satisfaction with the laborist model of care in a large urban hospital
【24h】

Patient satisfaction with the laborist model of care in a large urban hospital

机译:大型城市医院对医生的护理模式的患者满意度

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The obstetric practice environment is evolving to include more laborists staffing obstetric units, with the hope of improving quality of care and provider satisfaction, yet there are scant data on the impact of a laborist care model on patient satisfaction or delivery outcomes. We sought to assess patient satisfaction after implementation of the laborist model of obstetric care in a large urban teaching hospital. Methods: Postpartum patients were asked to complete an anonymous survey assessing their satisfaction with care, particularly with regard to the laborist model. Survey questions included rating the overall experience of labor and delivery. All responses were based on a five-point Likert scale. Press-Ganey results were compared from before and after initiation of the model. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. Results: Post-laborist implementation obstetric and delivery experience surveys were collected from 4166 patients, representing a 54% response rate. Ninety percent of patients reported that they were highly satisfied with the overall experience in the labor and delivery unit. A subgroup was asked to rate their experience with the practitioner for their current delivery. Of the 687 respondents, 75% answered excellent, 18% answered good/very good, and 3.4% answered neutral. Eighty-five percent of this subgroup stated that they were informed during prenatal care that they may be delivered by someone other than the practitioner or group that they saw during the pregnancy. Thirty-seven percent (n = 1553) of the total respondents reported that they had had a previous delivery at this institution, 97% (n = 1506) of whom stated "yes" to having their next delivery at this institution. Press-Ganey results were similarly favorable in both time periods (91.3 [n = 811] versus 93.4 [n = 747], P = 0.08). Conclusion: Patient satisfaction does not appear to be adversely affected by initiation of the laborist model. Additional research is needed to understand further the implications of this model for provider satisfaction, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
机译:背景:产科实践环境正在不断发展,以包括更多的产科工作人员,以期提高护理质量和服务提供者的满意度,但关于劳保模式对患者满意度或分娩结果的影响的数据很少。我们试图在一家大型城市教学医院实施产科护理的劳工模型后,评估患者的满意度。方法:要求产后患者完成一项匿名调查,以评估他们对护理的满意度,尤其是对劳动者模型的满意度。调查问题包括对人工和分娩的总体经验进行评估。所有回应均基于五点李克特量表。从模型启动之前和之后比较Press-Ganey结果。描述性统计用于分析结果。结果:从4166例患者中收集了劳动后实施产科和分娩经历的调查,反映了54%的响应率。 90%的患者报告说,他们对分娩和分娩部门的整体经验非常满意。一个小组被要求对他们目前从业者的经验进行评分。在687位受访者中,有75%的回答为优秀,有18%的回答为好/非常,而3.4%的回答为中立。该亚组中有85%的人表示,他们在产前检查中被告知,可能是由他们在怀孕期间所见的医生或小组以外的人分娩的。在全部受访者中,有37%(n = 1553)表示他们曾在该机构接受过一次分娩,其中97%(n = 1506)对这个机构在下次接受过分娩表示“是”。在两个时间段内,Press-Ganey的结果均相似(91.3 [n = 811]对93.4 [n = 747],P = 0.08)。结论:劳动者模型的启动似乎并未对患者满意度产生不利影响。需要进一步研究以进一步了解该模型对服务提供者满意度以及孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号