...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparing titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages
【24h】

Radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparing titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages

机译:颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合术患者的放射学和临床结局:钛和PEEK(聚醚醚酮)笼的比较

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: To study clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who had undergone the procedure of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium or PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages for cervical disc prolapse. Methods: This is a retrospectiveon-randomized study which was conducted at the Combined Military Hospital Peshawar. Study interval was four years from 1st October, 2010 to 31st September, 2014. Total number of included patients were 149. All of the patients had undergone the procedure of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium or PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages. All of the patients had plain MRI cervical spine done for diagnosis of anterior cervical disc prolapse. Results: Most of the patients had stenosis at the C5 / C6 (PEEK cage group 63% and titanium cage group 47.6%) and C6 / C7 (PEEK cage group 15.38% and titanium cage group 19.04%) cervical level. Bi-level involvement was also seen. In the patients who complained of brachialgia, total resolution of symptoms was seen after the operation. Three (2.01%) of the patients in titanium cage group, who presented with axial neck pain, continued to complain of pain after the operation. Four (2.6%) of the patients in PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cage group and 2 (1.3%) in titanium cage group complained of pain at the donor site (iliac crest). Fusion rate was 100% with both titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages at one year. Conclusion: Results with titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages are excellent. There was no significant difference in clinical and radiological outcome between two groups of patients (p 0.05). Fusion rate was 100% at one year with both cages.
机译:目的:研究接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除术并与钛或PEEK(聚醚醚酮)笼融合治疗颈椎间盘突出症的患者的临床和影像学结果。方法:这是一项在白沙瓦联合军事医院进行的回顾性/非随机性研究。研究间隔为2010年10月1日至2014年9月31日,为期4年。纳入的患者总数为149名。所有患者均接受了颈椎前路椎间盘切除术并与钛或PEEK(聚醚醚酮)笼融合术。所有患者均行MRI平扫检查颈椎前突脱出。结果:大多数患者在颈椎水平C5 / C6(PEEK笼组63%,钛笼组47.6%)和C6 / C7(PEEK笼组15.38%,钛笼组19.04%)出现狭窄。还看到了两级参与。在主诉臂肌痛的患者中,术后可完全缓解症状。钛笼组中的三名(2.01%)患者出现了颈项颈痛,术后仍继续感到疼痛。 PEEK(聚醚醚酮)笼组中的四名患者(2.6%)和钛笼组中的2名患者(1.3%)抱怨供体部位(ilia)疼痛。钛笼和PEEK(聚醚醚酮)笼的融合率均为100%。结论:钛和PEEK(聚醚醚酮)笼的效果极佳。两组患者的临床和放射学结果无显着差异(p> 0.05)。两个笼子一年的融合率为100%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号