首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >A new nasal cavity nursing methods application in patients with mechanical ventilation
【24h】

A new nasal cavity nursing methods application in patients with mechanical ventilation

机译:一种新的鼻腔护理方法在机械通气患者中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To compare different nasal cavity nursing methods on mechanically ventilated patients.Methods: According to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEII), 615 cases of mechanically ventilated patients were divided into group A, group B and group C by stratified random method. Traditional oral nursing plus aspirating secretions from oral cavity and nasal cavity q6h were done in group A. Based on methods in group A, normal saline was used for cleaning nasal cavity in group B. Besides the methods in group A, atomizing nasal cleansing a6h was also used in group C. Incidence rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) and APACHE II scores after administrating were compared. The correlation between APACHE II score and outcomes was analyzed by Spearman-rank correlation.Results: In group A, incidence of VAP was 36.76%, group B was 30.24%, group C was 20.38%, and the difference was statistically significant. APACHE II scores in group C were significantly lower compared with group A and B. APACHE II score was negatively correlated with clinical outcomes.Conclusions: For mechanically ventilated patients, nasal nursing can’t be ignored and the new atomizing nasal cleaning is an effective method for VAP prevention
机译:目的:比较机械通气患者不同的鼻腔护理方法。方法:根据急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHEII),采用分层随机方法将615例机械通气患者分为A组,B组和C组。在A组中进行传统的口腔护理,并从口腔和鼻腔中抽出分泌液,每6h一次。根据A组的方法,B组使用生理盐水清洗鼻腔。除A组中的方法外,雾化鼻腔清洁a6h是还比较了C组的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率和APACHE II评分。结果:A组VAP发生率为36.76%,B组为30.24%,C组为20.38%,差异有统计学意义。 C组的APACHE II评分显着低于A组和B组。APACHEII评分与临床结局呈负相关。结论:对于机械通气患者,不可忽视的是鼻部护理,新的雾化鼻腔清洁是一种有效的方法预防VAP

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号