...
首页> 外文期刊>Parkinson’s Disease >Cognitive Stimulation for Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease Dementia Living in Long-Term Care: Preliminary Data from a Randomized Crossover Pilot Study
【24h】

Cognitive Stimulation for Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease Dementia Living in Long-Term Care: Preliminary Data from a Randomized Crossover Pilot Study

机译:生活在长期护理中的帕金森氏病痴呆症患者的认知刺激:随机交叉试验研究的初步数据

获取原文

摘要

Background. While the efficacy of cognitive stimulation (CS) has been demonstrated in patients with dementia, no study has included patients with Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD). Objective. For the first time, this randomized crossover pilot study examined the feasibility and potential effects of CS in PDD. Methods. All residents of a PDD-specific long-term care unit in the Netherlands that were eligible for the study () were randomly allocated to group A () receiving CS (eight weeks, twice weekly for 60?minutes) or group B () receiving usual care (control group, CG). The CG participated in CS afterwards, resulting in an experimental group (EG), consisting of . Pre- and postassessments and a six-week follow-up (FU) were conducted for cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life (QoL), and activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes. Results. Between-group analysis with difference scores from pre- to posttest revealed a group difference for global cognition (CERAD total score) favoring the EG, with a moderate effect size and a value just failing to reach statistical significance (;r = 0.43). A further statistical trend was observed for neuropsychiatric symptoms, again with a moderate effect size (;r = 0.42). Within-group analyses indicated improvement only in the EG with large effects also just failing to reach significance for global cognition (short term, ;r = 0.70) as well as for depression (long term, ;r = 0.61). ADL deteriorated significantly at FU in the EG (;r = 0.71). Conclusions. Although our data are preliminary due to the small sample size, this study shows that CS is feasible and potentially effective for cognitive and noncognitive outcomes in PDD patients. Randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these promising results.
机译:背景。尽管认知刺激(CS)在痴呆症患者中的疗效已得到证实,但尚无研究包括帕金森氏病痴呆症(PDD)患者。目的。这项随机交叉试验研究首次研究了CS在PDD中的可行性和潜在影响。方法。荷兰所有PDD专用长期护理单位中符合研究条件的居民()被随机分配到接受CS(八周,每周两次,每次60分钟)的A组()或接受CS(B)的B组()常规护理(对照组,CG)。 CG随后参加了CS,形成了一个实验小组(EG),由组成。对认知,神经精神症状,生活质量(QoL)和日常生活活动(ADL)结果进行了评估前和评估后以及六周的随访(FU)。结果。组间分析从测试前到测试后的差异评分显示,总体认知的组差异(CERAD总评分)有利于EG,其效应大小适中,其值未达到统计学显着性(r = 0.43)。在神经精神症状方面观察到了进一步的统计趋势,再次出现了中等程度的效应(r = 0.42)。组内分析表明,仅在EG方面有改善,而对整体认知(短期,r = 0.70)和抑郁症(长期,r = 0.61)的影响还没有达到显着水平。 EG的FU时ADL显着降低(; r = 0.71)。结论。尽管由于样本量小,我们的数据是初步的,但这项研究表明CS对于PDD患者的认知和非认知结局是可行的并且可能有效。需要更大样本量的随机对照试验来确认这些有希望的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号