首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Fusion or Not for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
【24h】

Fusion or Not for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

机译:融合或非融合性退行性腰椎管狭窄症的荟萃分析和系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is the main cause for chronic low backpain in the elderly. When refractory to conservative treatment, symptomatic patients commonlyundergo surgery. However, whether or not fusion is a relatively better surgical option still remainsunclear.Objective: The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the clinical outcomesof spinal decompression with or without spinal fusion for DLSS.Study Design: A systematic review of the therapeutic effect for DLSS with or without fusion.Methods: A literature search of 5 electronic databases was performed including PubMed,EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL from inception to August 2016. Onlyrandomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the comparison between decompression and fusionsurgery for DLSS were included.Results: A total of 5 RCTs involving 438 patients met the inclusion criteria. Low-quality evidenceof the meta-analysis was performed for the heterogeneity of the included studies. Pooledanalysis showed no significant differences between decompression alone and fusion groups forthe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at the baseline (P = 0.50) and 2 years follow-up (P =0.71), and the satisfaction rate of operations was also similar for the groups (P = 0.53). However,operation time (P = 0.002), blood loss (P < 0.00001), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.007) wereremarkably higher in the fusion group. Furthermore, there was no difference in the reoperationrate between these 2 groups at the latest follow-up (P = 0.49).Limitation: The methodological criteria and sample sizes were highly variable. The studies wereheterogeneous.Conclusion: The present meta-analysis is the first to compare the efficacy of decompressionalone and spinal fusion for the treatment of DLSS, including 5 RCTs. Our results demonstrate thatadditional fusion surgery seems unlikely to result in better outcomes for patients with DLSS, but itmay increase additional risks and costs. High-quality homogeneous research is required to providefurther evidence about surgical procedures for patients with DLSS.
机译:背景:退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)是老年人慢性腰痛的主要原因。当对保守治疗无效时,有症状的患者通常要接受手术。然而,融合术是否是相对较好的手术方法仍不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是系统地回顾有或没有脊柱融合术治疗DLSS的脊柱减压的临床结果。研究设计:系统评价治疗效果方法:从开始到2016年8月,对包括PubMed,EMBASE,MEDLINE,Cochrane Library和CENTRAL在内的5个电子数据库进行了文献检索。仅随机对照试验(RCT)评估了减压与融合手术的比较结果:共有438例患者的5项RCT符合纳入标准。对纳入研究的异质性进行了荟萃分析的低质量证据。汇总分析显示,在基线(P = 0.50)和2年随访(P = 0.71)时,单独减压和融合组的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)得分之间无显着差异,并且手术的满意率也相似组(P = 0.53)。然而,融合组的手术时间(P = 0.002),失血(P <0.00001)和住院时间(P = 0.007)明显更高。此外,在最近的随访中,两组之间的再手术率没有差异(P = 0.49)。限制:方法学标准和样本量变化很大。结论:本荟萃分析是第一个比较单独减压和脊柱融合术治疗DLSS(包括5个RCT)的疗效的研究。我们的结果表明,额外的融合手术似乎不太可能为DLSS患者带来更好的结果,但可能会增加额外的风险和成本。需要高质量的同质研究以提供有关DLSS患者手术方法的更多证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号