首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Effective health care for older people resident in care homes: the optimal study protocol for realist review
【24h】

Effective health care for older people resident in care homes: the optimal study protocol for realist review

机译:为居住在养老院的老年人提供有效的医疗保健:针对现实主义者进行审查的最佳研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Care homes in the UK rely on general practice for access to specialist medical and nursing care as well as referral to therapists and secondary care. Service delivery to care homes is highly variable in both quantity and quality. This variability is also evident in the commissioning and organisation of care home-specific services that range from the payment of incentives to general practitioners (GPs) to visit care homes, to the creation of care home specialist teams and outreach services run by geriatricians. No primary studies or systematic reviews have robustly evaluated the impact of these different approaches on organisation and resident-level outcomes. Our aim is to identify factors which may explain the perceived or demonstrated effectiveness of programmes to improve health-related outcomes in older people living in care homes. Methods/Design A realist review approach will be used to develop a theoretical understanding of what works when, why and in what circumstances. Elements of service models of interest include those that focus on assessment and management of residents’ health, those that use strategies to encourage closer working between visiting health care providers and care home staff, and those that address system-wide issues about access to assessment and treatment. These will include studies on continence, dignity, and speech and language assessment as well as interventions to promote person centred dementia care, improve strength and mobility, and nutrition. The impact of these interventions and their different mechanisms will be considered in relation to five key outcomes: residents’ medication use, use of out of hours’ services, hospital admissions (including use of Accident and Emergency) and length of hospital stay, costs and user satisfaction. An iterative three-stage approach will be undertaken that is stakeholder-driven and optimises the knowledge and networks of the research team. Discussion This realist review will explore why and for whom different approaches to providing health care to residents in care homes improves access to health care in the five areas of interest. It will inform commissioning decisions and be the basis for further research. This systematic review protocol is registered on the PROSPERO database reference number: CRD42014009112.
机译:英国的背景护理院依靠一般做法来获得专科医疗和护理服务,以及转介治疗师和二级护理服务。提供给养老院的服务在数量和质量上都存在很大差异。这种差异在护理院特定服务的调试和组织中也很明显,其范围包括从奖励全科医生到参观护理院的全科医生(GP)到建立护理院专家团队和由老年医生提供的外展服务。没有任何初步研究或系统评价能有效评估这些不同方法对组织和居民水平结果的影响。我们的目的是确定可以解释改善居住在养老院中老年人健康相关结果的计划的感知或证明的有效性的因素。方法/设计将使用现实主义者的审查方法来建立对什么时候,为什么以及在什么情况下有效的理论理解。感兴趣的服务模型的要素包括那些侧重于居民健康评估和管理的要素,那些使用策略鼓励就诊的医疗保健提供者和护理之家人员之间进行更紧密合作的要素,以及那些涉及评估和获取的全系统问题的要素。治疗。这些将包括关于节制,尊严,言语和语言评估的研究,以及旨在促进以人为中心的痴呆症护理,提高力量和活动能力以及营养的干预措施。这些干预措施及其不同机制的影响将与以下五个关键结果相关:居民的药物使用,使用非工作时间服务,住院(包括使用事故和紧急情况)以及住院时间,费用和费用。用户满意度。将采取由利益相关方驱动的迭代三阶段方法,并优化研究团队的知识和网络。讨论该现实主义者的评论将探讨为什么和为谁向养老院中的居民提供医疗保健的不同方法改善了五个关注领域中的医疗保健机会。它将为调试决策提供依据,并成为进一步研究的基础。该系统审核协议已在PROSPERO数据库参考号CRD42014009112上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号