首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
【24h】

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study

机译:标准化培训对Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具可靠性的影响:一项前瞻性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The Cochrane risk of bias tool is commonly criticized for having a low reliability. We aimed to investigate whether training of raters, with objective and standardized instructions on how to assess risk of bias, can improve the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Methods In this pilot study, four raters inexperienced in risk of bias assessment were randomly allocated to minimal or intensive standardized training for risk of bias assessment of randomized trials of physical therapy treatments for patients with knee osteoarthritis pain. Two raters were experienced risk of bias assessors who served as reference. The primary outcome of our study was between-group reliability, defined as the agreement of the risk of bias assessments of inexperienced raters with the reference assessments of experienced raters. Consensus-based assessments were used for this purpose. The secondary outcome was within-group reliability, defined as the agreement of assessments within pairs of inexperienced raters. We calculated the chance-corrected weighted Kappa to quantify agreement within and between groups of raters for each of the domains of the risk of bias tool. Results A total of 56 trials were included in our analysis. The Kappa for the agreement of inexperienced raters with reference across items of the risk of bias tool ranged from 0.10 to 0.81 for the minimal training group and from 0.41 to 0.90 for the standardized training group. The Kappa values for the agreement within pairs of inexperienced raters across the items of the risk of bias tool ranged from 0 to 0.38 for the minimal training group and from 0.93 to 1 for the standardized training group. Between-group differences in Kappa for the agreement of inexperienced raters with reference always favored the standardized training group and was most pronounced for incomplete outcome data (difference in Kappa 0.52, p Conclusions Intensive, standardized training on risk of bias assessment may significantly improve the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
机译:背景技术Cochrane偏倚风险工具通常因可靠性低而受到批评。我们旨在调查评估者的培训是否具有客观和标准化的指导,以评估评估偏倚风险的方法是否可以提高Cochrane偏倚风险工具的可靠性。方法在这项前瞻性研究中,随机将四名缺乏偏见评估风险的评估者分配到最低限度或强化标准培训中,以进行针对膝骨关节炎患者的物理疗法随机试验的偏见评估风险。有两个评估者经历过偏见评估者的风险,并以此作为参考。我们研究的主要结果是组间可靠性,定义为经验不足的评估者的偏见评估与经验丰富的评估者的参考评估之间的一致性。为此,使用了基于共识的评估。次要结果是组内可靠性,定义为对缺乏经验的评估者进行评估的一致性。我们计算了机会校正后的加权Kappa,以针对偏倚风险工具的每个领域量化评估者组内和评估组之间的一致性。结果我们的分析共包括56个试验。经验不足的评分者对偏倚工具风险项的参考的Kappa(最小培训组)为0.10至0.81,标准化培训组为0.41至0.90。跨偏见风险工具项目的经验不足的评估者对中的协议的Kappa值,对于最小培训组,范围为0至0.38,对于标准培训组,范围为0.93至1。缺乏经验的评分者与参考者达成一致的Kappa组间差异总是偏向于标准化培训组,并且对于不完整的结果数据最为明显(Kappa中的差异0.52,p结论偏倚风险评估的强化,标准化培训可能会显着提高可靠性Cochrane偏倚风险工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号