首页> 外文期刊>Studi Slavistici >The Russian intelligentsia and the Ukrainian question. A comparison between P.B. Struve and N.S. Trubeckoj.
【24h】

The Russian intelligentsia and the Ukrainian question. A comparison between P.B. Struve and N.S. Trubeckoj.

机译:俄罗斯知识分子和乌克兰问题。 PB之间的比较斯特鲁夫和N.S. Trubeckoj。

获取原文
       

摘要

The article focuses on the relationship between two authoritative members of the Russian intelligentsia , P.B. Struve and N.S. Trubeckoj, and the Ukrainian question at the beginning of the 20th century. Two debates, one involving Struve and an anonymous Ukrainian in 1911-1912, and the other between Trubeckoj and the Ukrainian historian D. Doro?enko in 1927-1928, are presented and compared in order to highlight similarities in terms of content and cultural approach to the issue of Ukraine’s cultural and political independence from Russia. A shared cultural background, as well as the indisputable influence exerted by Struve on the Eurasian movement founded by Trubeckoj and other emigrant intellectuals, are considered the main causes of the convergent opinions examined in the article. In their writings Struve and Trubeckoj both express the need for a larger, pan-Russian cultural entity, in which the highest level is not achievable by Ukrainian culture by reason of its regional or local nature. Consequently, they roundly condemn the tendency towards separatism of the Ukrainian intelligentsia.
机译:本文重点介绍俄罗斯知识分子P.B.的两个权威成员之间的关系。斯特鲁夫和N.S. Trubeckoj,以及20世纪初的乌克兰问题。提出并比较了两次辩论,其中一场辩论涉及斯特鲁夫和一位匿名的乌克兰人(1911-1912年),另一场辩论在特鲁贝克科与乌克兰历史学家多罗琴科(1927-1928年)之间,以强调内容和文化方法的相似性乌克兰脱离俄罗斯的文化和政治独立问题。共同的文化背景以及斯特鲁贝(Struve)对特鲁贝克科(Trubeckoj)和其他移民知识分子发起的欧亚运动产生了不可争议的影响,被认为是本文研究的聚合观点的主要原因。斯特鲁夫(Struve)和特鲁贝克(Trubeckoj)都表达了对更大的泛俄罗斯文化实体的需求,由于乌克兰文化的区域性或地方性,无法达到最高水平。因此,他们全面谴责乌克兰知识分子的分裂主义倾向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号