首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Neurology International >Preliminary study showing safety/efficacy of nanoss bioactive versus vitoss as bone graft expanders for lumbar noninstrumented fusions
【24h】

Preliminary study showing safety/efficacy of nanoss bioactive versus vitoss as bone graft expanders for lumbar noninstrumented fusions

机译:初步研究显示,nanoss生物活性剂与vitoss作为腰椎非器械融合器的骨移植扩展剂的安全性/有效性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The lateral fusion mass for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented posterolateral fusions now often utilizes lamina autograft and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) mixed with one of two bone graft expanders: either Vitoss (Orthovita, Malvern, PA, USA) or NanOss Bioactive (Regeneration Technologies Corporation: RTI, Alachua, FL, USA). Methods: Here, we compared two sequential prospective the times to fusion, fusion rates, complications, and infection rates for two prospective cohorts of patients utilizing either Vitoss (first 213 patients) or NanOss (subsequent 45 patients) respectively, undergoing multilevel lumbar laminectomies (average 4.6 vs. 4.5 levels) with noninstrumented fusions (average 1.3 vs. 1.2 levels). Surgery addressed stenosis/ossification of the yellow ligament (OYL) (all patients), with subsets exhibiting degenerative spondylolisthesis synovial cysts, and disc disease. Fusion was documented by two independent neuroradiologists blinded to the study design, utilizing dynamic X-rays and two dimensional computed tomography (2D-CT) studies up to 6 months postoperatively, and up to 1 year where indicated. Results: Comparison of patients receiving Vitoss versus NanOss as bone graft expanders revealed nearly comparable; times to fusion (5.3 months vs. 4.8 months), fusion rates (210 [98.6%] vs. 45 [100%] patients), pseudarthroses (3 [1.4%] vs. 0), postoperative seromas (2 [0.94%] vs. 0), and deep wound infections (2 [0.94%] vs. 0). Conclusion: In this preliminary study of patients undergoing multilevel lumbar lamienctomies with posterolateral noninstrumented fusions, results were nearly comparable utilizing Vitoss or NanOss as bone graft expanders. Although the number of NanOss patients was substantially lower, the comparable efficacy and absence of postoperative complications for noninstrumented fusions is promising.
机译:背景:现在,对于多级腰椎开颅手术,采用非器械性后外侧融合术的侧向融合块,通常采用椎板自体移植和骨髓穿刺术(BMA)与以下两种骨移植扩展器之一混合:Vitoss(Ortovita,Malvern,PA,美国)或NanOss Bioactive(再生技术公司:RTI,美国佛罗里达州阿拉卡瓦市。方法:在这里,我们比较了两个分别采用Vitoss(前213例)或NanOss(后继45例)并接受多级腰椎开颅手术的前瞻性队列研究的两个连续预期融合时间,融合率,并发症和感染率。非乐器融合(平均1.3与1.2水平)的平均4.6与4.5水平)。手术治疗了黄韧带狭窄(OYL)/骨化(所有患者),其子集表现出退行性腰椎滑膜滑膜囊肿和椎间盘疾病。两名不愿接受研究设计的独立神经放射科医生记录了融合情况,并利用动态X射线和二维计算机断层扫描(2D-CT)研究进行了长达6个月的术后检查,并指出了长达1年的研究结果。结果:比较接受Vitoss与NanOss作为骨移植扩展剂的患者几乎具有可比性。融合时间(5.3个月vs. 4.8个月),融合率(210 [98.6%] vs. 45 [100%]患者),假月糖(3 [1.4%] vs. 0),术后血清肿(2 [0.94%]) vs. 0)和深部伤口感染(2 [0.94%] vs. 0)。结论:在这项对患有后外侧非器械融合的多级腰椎开裂术的患者的初步研究中,使用Vitoss或NanOss作为骨移植扩展剂的结果几乎相当。尽管NanOss患者的数量大大减少,但非器械融合的可比疗效和无术后并发症的前景令人鼓舞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号