首页> 外文期刊>Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo >Manual versus target-controlled infusion of balanced propofol during diagnostic colonoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Manual versus target-controlled infusion of balanced propofol during diagnostic colonoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

机译:在诊断性结肠镜检查中手动输注与靶控输注平衡的异丙酚:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. There is an increasing interest in balanced propofol sedation (BPS) for colonoscopy in outpatient settings. Propofol is a potent anesthetic agent for this purpose and has a narrow therapeutic range, which increases a risk of cardiovascular and respiratory complications in case of improper administration. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare patients’ safety and comfort of endoscopists in two methods of BPS targeting deep sedation - propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manual intravenous titration technique (MT) - during colonoscopy. Methods. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 90 patients (class I or II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists) deeply sedated with propofol, coadministered with small doses of midazolam and fentanyl. Propofol was given by MT technique (45 patients) or by TCI (45 patients). The following adverse effects were recorded: hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, bradypnea, apnea, hiccupping, and coughing, as well as endoscopist’s comfort during colonoscopy by means of a questionnaire. Results. The MT group compared to the TCI group had a lower mean arterial pressure in the 10th minute after the beginning (p = 0.017), and at the end of colonoscopy (p = 0.006), higher oxygen saturation in the fifth minute (p = 0.033), and in the 15th minute (p = 0.008) after the beginning of colonoscopy, and lower heart rate at the beginning of the procedure (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events. Endoscopist’s comfort during colonoscopy was high 95.6% in the TCI group vs. 88.9% in the MT group (p = 0.069). Conclusion. MT is clinically as stable as TCI of propofol for deep sedation during colonoscopy, and endoscopists experienced the same comfort during colonoscopy in both groups. Thus, both combinations are suitable for deep sedation during diagnostic colonoscopy.
机译:介绍。在门诊患者中,对于结肠镜检查使用平衡的异丙酚镇静(BPS)越来越引起关注。丙泊酚是用于此目的的强效麻醉剂,其治疗范围狭窄,如果给药不当,则会增加发生心血管和呼吸系统并发症的风险。目的。这项研究的目的是比较结肠镜检查中两种针对深层镇静的BPS方法(丙泊酚靶控输注(TCI)和手动静脉滴定技术(MT))对内镜医师的安全性和舒适度。方法。这项前瞻性随机对照试验包括90例患者(美国麻醉医师学会的I级或II级)用丙泊酚深度镇静,并与小剂量的咪达唑仑和芬太尼合用。丙泊酚通过MT技术(45例)或TCI(45例)给予。记录了以下不良反应:血压低,高血压,心动过缓,心动过速,低氧血症,呼吸困难,呼吸暂停,打ic和咳嗽,以及内窥镜医师通过问卷调查的舒适度。结果。与TCI组相比,MT组在开始后第10分钟的平均动脉压较低(p = 0.017),在结肠镜检查结束时(p = 0.006),第5分钟的平均氧饱和度较高(p = 0.033) ),并在开始结肠镜检查后的第15分钟内(p = 0.008),并在手术开始时降低心率(p = 0.001)。不良事件无统计学差异。 TCI组内镜医师在结肠镜检查期间的舒适度高达95.6%,而MT组为88.9%(p = 0.069)。结论。在结肠镜检查期间,MT在临床上与丙泊酚的TCI镇静一样稳定,并且内镜检查者在两组结肠镜检查中都具有相同的舒适度。因此,两种组合都适合在诊断性结肠镜检查期间进行深度镇静。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号