首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Neurology International >Bioethics and why I hope to live beyond age 75 attaining wisdom!: A rebuttal to Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel's 75 age limit
【24h】

Bioethics and why I hope to live beyond age 75 attaining wisdom!: A rebuttal to Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel's 75 age limit

机译:生物伦理学以及为什么我希望活到75岁以上才能获得智慧!:驳斥Ezekiel Emanuel博士的75岁年龄限制

获取原文
           

摘要

American bioethicists have been providing persuasive arguments for rationing medical care via the theory of the necessary “rational allocation of finite health care resources.” Anticipating the need for the drastic rationing of medical care in the U.S. with the implementation of ObamaCare and assisted by various sectors of organized medicine in league with the State, bioethicists have deduced that more ingenious approaches are necessary to convince Americans who have been accustomed to receiving the best medical care that third-party payers are willing to pay for. It is in this context that the individual-based, patient-oriented ethics of Hippocrates, including his fundamental dictum, “First Do No Harm,” have to be supplanted by the utilitarian approach promoted by the bioethicists. And today's foremost proponent of the bioethics movement is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel. This editorial proposes a rational rebuttal to Dr. Emanuel's proposal to limit life expectancy to age 75 as a rational paradigm to a better life.
机译:美国生物伦理学家一直通过必要的“有限医疗资源的合理分配”理论提供有说服力的论点,以对医疗进行定量分配。预计随着奥巴马医改的实施,美国将需要对医疗服务进行严格的配给,并在与州政府合作的有组织医学的各个部门的协助下,生物伦理学家得出结论,说服惯于接受这种治疗的美国人的方法必须更为巧妙第三方付款人愿意支付的最佳医疗服务。正是在这种情况下,希波克拉底的基于个人,以患者为中心的伦理学,包括他的基本格言“首先不要伤害”,必须被生物伦理学家所提倡的功利主义方法所取代。今天,生物伦理学运动的最重要支持者是埃塞克尔·伊曼纽尔博士。这篇社论对伊曼纽尔博士提出的将预期寿命限制在75岁的建议进行了合理的反驳,以此作为改善生活的理性范式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号