首页> 外文期刊>Stem cells translational medicine. >Long‐Term Results of Cultured Limbal Stem Cell Versus Limbal Tissue Transplantation in Stage III Limbal Deficiency
【24h】

Long‐Term Results of Cultured Limbal Stem Cell Versus Limbal Tissue Transplantation in Stage III Limbal Deficiency

机译:在III期肢体缺乏症中培养的肢体干细胞与肢体组织移植的长期结果

获取原文
       

摘要

We aimed to evaluate efficiency and safety of transplantation of limbal stem cells (LSC) cultured on human amniotic membrane with no feeders and to compare cultured LSC with limbal tissue transplantation. Thirty eyes with stage III LSC deficiency were treated with autologous (autoLSC) or allogeneic (alloLSC) cultured LSC transplantation (prospective phase II clinical trial; average follow‐up time, 72?months) or autologous (autoLT) or allogeneic (alloLT) limbal tissue transplantation (retrospective control group; average follow‐up time, 132?months) between 1993 and 2014. The 5‐year graft survival defined by absence of recurrence of the clinical signs of limbal deficiency was 71% for autoLSC, 0% for alloLSC, 75% for autoLT, and 33% for alloLT. Visual acuity improved by 9.2 lines for autoLSC and 3.3 lines for autoLT. It decreased by 0.7 lines for alloLSC and 1.9 lines for alloLT. Adverse events were recorded in 1/7 autoLSC, 7/7 alloLSC, 6/8 autoLT, and 8/8 alloLT patients. Corneal epithelial defect was the only adverse event recorded after autoLSC, whereas severe sight‐threatening adverse events were recorded in the remaining three groups. Compared with failed grafts, successful grafts featured greater decrease in fluorescein staining, greater superficial vascularization‐free corneal area, lower variability of the corneal epithelial thickness, and higher corneal epithelial basal cell density. Autologous cultured LSC transplantation was associated with high long‐term survival and dramatic improvement in vision and was very safe. Autologous limbal tissue transplantation resulted in similar efficiency but was less safe. Cadaver allogeneic grafts resulted in low long‐term success rate and high prevalence of serious adverse events.
机译:我们旨在评估无饲养层的人羊膜上培养的角膜缘干细胞(LSC)移植的效率和安全性,并将培养的LSC与角膜缘组织移植进行比较。用自体(autoLSC)或同种异体(alloLSC)培养的LSC移植(前瞻性II期临床试验;平均随访时间72个月)或自体(autoLT)或同种异体(alloLT)角膜缘缘炎治疗了30例III期LSC缺乏的眼睛在1993年至2014年间进行组织移植(回顾性对照组;平均随访时间132个月)。autoLSC的5年移植物存活定义为无复发性角膜缘缺水的临床征兆,alloLSC为0% ,对于autoLT为75%,对于alloLT为33%。 autoLSC的视敏度提高了9.2行,autoLT的视敏度提高了3.3行。对于alloLSC,它降低了0.7行,对于alloLT,它降低了1.9行。在1/7 autoLSC,7/7 alloLSC,6/8 autoLT和8/8 alloLT患者中记录了不良事件。角膜上皮缺损是autoLSC术后唯一记录的不良事件,而其余三组记录到严重的威胁视力的不良事件。与失败的移植物相比,成功的移植物具有以下特点:荧光素染色减少更多,无表皮血管形成的角膜面积更大,角膜上皮厚度的变异性更低以及角膜上皮基底细胞密度更高。自体培养的LSC移植与长期生存率高和视力显着改善有关,非常安全。自体角膜缘组织移植的效率相似,但安全性较低。尸体异体移植导致长期成功率低,严重不良事件发生率高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号