首页> 外文期刊>Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia >Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for intranasal premedication in children posted for elective surgery: a double-blind, randomised study
【24h】

Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for intranasal premedication in children posted for elective surgery: a double-blind, randomised study

机译:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于择期手术儿童鼻内用药的比较:一项双盲,随机研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with midazolam for intranasal premedication in children posted for elective surgery.Trial design: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical study.Method: 60 children, 3 to 10 years of age, with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, scheduled for elective surgery, were randomly divided into two groups, group D (dexmedetomidine) and group M (midazolam). Group D patients received intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and group M patients intranasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg, approximately 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia, in the form of a spray.Outcome: Preoperative effects on heart rate, blood pressure, sedation and anxiety including parental separation and mask acceptance were assessed.Results: Intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) premedication resulted in statistically significant but clinically unimportant lower heart rate and blood pressure at 10, 20, and 30 minutes following administration compared with intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg). There were no episodes of hypotension or bradycardia. Children in group D achieved better parental separation and mask acceptance scores compared with group M.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine resulted in better parental separation and mask acceptance scores than intranasal midazolam. Thus it would seem to offer some advantage compared with midazolam.(Full text available online at www.medpharm.tandfonline.com/ojaa)South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2015; DOI: 10.1080/22201181.2015.1075937
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较右美托咪定与咪达唑仑在择期手术儿童鼻内用药中的效果。试验设计:这是一项前瞻性,随机,双盲临床研究。方法:60名儿童,3至10年岁,计划进行择期手术的美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)身体状况I随机分为两组,D组(右美托咪定)和M组(咪达唑仑)。 D组患者在麻醉诱导前约30分钟以喷雾形式接受鼻内右美托咪定1μg/ kg和M组鼻内咪达唑仑0.2 mg / kg的结果:术前对心率,血压,镇静和焦虑的影响结果:鼻内右美托咪定(1μg/ kg)的预用药与鼻内咪达唑仑(0.2 mg)相比,给药后10、20和30分钟的心率和血压降低具有统计学意义,但在临床上并不重要/公斤)。没有低血压或心动过缓的发作。与M组相比,D组儿童获得了更好的父母分离和面膜接受评分。结论:右美托咪定比鼻内咪达唑仑产生更好的父母分离和面膜接受评分。因此,与咪达唑仑相比,它似乎具有一些优势。(全文可在线访问www.medpharm.tandfonline.com/ojaa)South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2015; DOI:10.1080 / 22201181.2015.1075937

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号